Remove tags Status Of This Document section #807
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The IETF status doesn't matter. The document is found at the IETF anyway. We already describe the goal of the document in the Introdution. And the EBML RFC doesn't has a status either. The Matroska document has one because it deals with versions of Matroska.
retokromer
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2023
|
The RPC will put in the correct text there. |
So we can remove it or keep it as a placeholder ? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The IETF status doesn't matter. The document is found at the IETF anyway. We already describe the goal of the document in the Introdution.
And the EBML RFC doesn't has a status either. The Matroska document has one because it deals with versions of Matroska.