Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switching to Bun for dev #783

Open
wants to merge 43 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Switching to Bun for dev #783

wants to merge 43 commits into from

Conversation

jamonholmgren
Copy link
Member

Switches to Bun

CleanShot 2023-09-15 at 18 24 20@2x

This PR switches to using Bun as the development runtime. This is an experiment; however, it's way, WAY faster to run. Like 20x+ faster in my tests.

Gluegun will continue to work in Node-powered CLIs (and we need to do extensive testing to ensure that is the case). Over time, the gap between the two runtimes will converge. And, if it works well enough, we will recommend that others use Bun instead of Node.

Running this with Bun would mean doing something like this:

bunx --bun gluegun ...

Jarred said that they're looking to make this better. https://twitter.com/jarredsumner/status/1702840231584743485

You can also run bunx gluegun-bun ... (theoretically), and locally you can link it with bun link and then gluegun-bun ... to force using bun.

Removes the ability to generate JS (non-TypeScript) CLIs using gluegun new

This has been a long time coming. The reasons for removing the JS-only template are that we do not use Gluegun to build CLIs without TypeScript anymore and this also simplifies the template quite a bit.

Yes, I could make this a separate PR. Why do you ask? 馃槄

@jamonholmgren
Copy link
Member Author

Oh, and thanks to @cmgriffing for the bun orb!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants