ci: Add GitHub Workflow (#1879)

[jcubic]

• chore(deps-dev): bump express from 4.17.1 to 4.19.2 (chore(deps-dev): bump express from 4.17.1 to 4.19.2 #1891)

Bumps express from 4.17.1 to 4.19.2.

• Release notes
• Changelog
• Commits

---

updated-dependencies:

• dependency-name: express dependency-type: indirect ...

• fix: handle no-refs response from git-upload-pack for git > 2.41.0 (fix: handle no-refs response from git-upload-pack for git > 2.41.0 #1862)

• ci: Add GitHub Workflow

• Prevent ERR_OSSL_EVP_UNSUPPORTED on Node >= 17

---

I'm fixing a bug or typo

• if this is your first time contributing, run npm run add-contributor and follow the prompts to add yourself to the README
• squash merge the PR with commit message "fix: [Description of fix]"

I'm adding a parameter to an existing command X:

• add parameter to the function in src/api/X.js (and src/commands/X.js if necessary)
• document the parameter in the JSDoc comment above the function
• add a test case in __tests__/test-X.js if possible
• if this is your first time contributing, run npm run add-contributor and follow the prompts to add yourself to the README
• squash merge the PR with commit message "feat(X): Added 'bar' parameter"

I'm adding a new command:

• add as a new file in src/api (and src/commands if necessary)
• add command to src/index.js
• update __tests__/test-exports.js
• create a test in src/__tests__
• document the command with a JSDoc comment
• add page to the Docs Sidebar website/sidebars.json
• add page to the v1 Docs Sidebar website/versioned_sidebars/version-1.x-sidebars.json
• if this is your first time contributing, run npm run add-contributor and follow the prompts to add yourself to the README
• squash merge the PR with commit message "feat: Added 'X' command"

[seanpoulter]

I believe this is from another commit. Is it worth a rebase or merge to keep it separate?

[jcubic]

Yea, it was the commit to handle empty repositories.

[jcubic]

I will need to redo the merge locally, because GitHub required to squash the whole history.

[jcubic]

Created second PR #1902

[seanpoulter]

That seems to work well, eh? We could fix the Node 16 warning from Codespell in another PR.