Improve section numbering #634
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
manovotn
reviewed
Sep 19, 2022
CDI specification up to version 3.0 used to have the sections numbered in a friendly way: 1. Architecture 2. Concepts 3. Programming model And so on. With CDI 4.0 and the split to Lite and Full, sections were renumbered in a more ugly fashion: 1. Architecture 2. CDI Lite 2.1. Concepts 2.2. Programming model 3. CDI Full Note that this numbering is different from the TCK Audit tool expectations and hence the TCK Audit reports are incorrect. This commit restores the original numbering, which is more user-friendly and also conforms to the expectations of the TCK Audit tool.
Ladicek
force-pushed
the
section-numbering
branch
from
8f7fd51
to
ca55263
Compare
manovotn
approved these changes
Sep 20, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CDI specification up to version 3.0 used to have the sections numbered in a friendly way:
And so on. With CDI 4.0 and the split to Lite and Full, sections were renumbered in a more ugly fashion:
2.1. Concepts
2.2. Programming model
Note that this numbering is different from the TCK Audit tool expectations and hence the TCK Audit reports are incorrect.
This commit restores the original numbering, which is more user-friendly and also conforms to the expectations of the TCK Audit tool.