Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wording improvements #670

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Apr 26, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Ladicek
Copy link
Contributor

@Ladicek Ladicek commented Apr 25, 2023

The last commit fixes #667

This paragraph used to have a few sentences that used terms from
the bean type assignability part of the specification, which is
inappropriate for this part of the specification.
@Ladicek Ladicek requested a review from manovotn April 25, 2023 15:20
@Ladicek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ladicek commented Apr 25, 2023

There's a few more improvements as well, nicely split into individual commits.

Copy link
Contributor

@manovotn manovotn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just wording clarifications, no changes in meaning.

@manovotn manovotn merged commit cbcc72d into jakartaee:master Apr 26, 2023
2 checks passed
@Ladicek Ladicek deleted the wording-improvements branch April 26, 2023 09:07
@Ladicek Ladicek added this to the CDI 4.1 milestone May 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix enabled beans link in CDI Full
2 participants