Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move the add/edit description button to the app-bar #9271

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mawinter69
Copy link
Contributor

@mawinter69 mawinter69 commented May 13, 2024

So far the add/edit description button is rendered on its own line to the far right. This leads to additional space between the description or the title and the following content.

This change moves the add/edit description button to the app-bar where applicable (jobs, runs, computers, users and labels). For views it stays as it is as they don't have a title/app-bar. One also can't just allow to change the description via the configure page as the All View has no configure page.

The change is backwards compatible so plugins using the editableDescription taglib will work as before.

Requires changes in Matrix-project and maven-project plugins to align the new layout

Before/after:

Job:

Before:
image
After:
image
A pipeline job:
image

Run:

Before:
image
After:
image
After clicking the Add Description button
image

User:

Before:
image
After:
image

Computer:

Before:
image
After:
image

Label:

Before:
image
After:
image

Testing done

Manual Testing

Proposed changelog entries

  • Move Add/Edit description to app bar

Proposed upgrade guidelines

N/A

Submitter checklist

Edit tasklist title
Beta Give feedback Tasklist Submitter checklist, more options

Delete tasklist

Delete tasklist block?
Are you sure? All relationships in this tasklist will be removed.
  1. The Jira issue, if it exists, is well-described.
    Options
  2. The changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developers, depending on the change) and are in the imperative mood (see examples). Fill in the Proposed upgrade guidelines section only if there are breaking changes or changes that may require extra steps from users during upgrade.
    Options
  3. There is automated testing or an explanation as to why this change has no tests.
    Options
  4. New public classes, fields, and methods are annotated with @Restricted or have @since TODO Javadocs, as appropriate.
    Options
  5. New deprecations are annotated with @Deprecated(since = "TODO") or @Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "TODO"), if applicable.
    Options
  6. New or substantially changed JavaScript is not defined inline and does not call eval to ease future introduction of Content Security Policy (CSP) directives (see documentation).
    Options
  7. For dependency updates, there are links to external changelogs and, if possible, full differentials.
    Options
  8. For new APIs and extension points, there is a link to at least one consumer.
    Options

Desired reviewers

@mention

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

Maintainer checklist

Edit tasklist title
Beta Give feedback Tasklist Maintainer checklist, more options

Delete tasklist

Delete tasklist block?
Are you sure? All relationships in this tasklist will be removed.
  1. There are at least two (2) approvals for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change.
    Options
  2. Conversations in the pull request are over, or it is explicit that a reviewer is not blocking the change.
    Options
  3. Changelog entries in the pull request title and/or Proposed changelog entries are accurate, human-readable, and in the imperative mood.
    Options
  4. Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically.
    Options
  5. If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, the upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the pull request title (see example).
    Options
  6. If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a Bug or Improvement, and be labeled as lts-candidate to be considered (see query).
    Options

So far rhe add/edit description button is rendered as button on its own
line to the far right. This leads to additional space the description or
the title and the following content.

This change moves the add/edit description button to the app-bar where
applicable (jobs, runs, computers, users). For views it stays as it is
as they don't have title/app-bar. One also can't just allow to change
the description via the configure page as the All View has no configure
page.
@mawinter69
Copy link
Contributor Author

mawinter69 commented May 14, 2024

Some questions to think about

  • make the add/edit description button a secondary button?
  • should I directly create an overflow button that takes add/edit description?

On the run page

  • also move the keep build forever to overflow?
  • move the info about when the build started and how long it took to the left like e.g. the info about the cause.

image

@mawinter69
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jenkinsci/sig-ux

@NotMyFault NotMyFault added rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted needs-security-review Awaiting review by a security team member labels May 18, 2024
@NotMyFault NotMyFault requested a review from a team May 18, 2024 14:34
@timja timja requested a review from janfaracik May 18, 2024 19:58
@janfaracik
Copy link
Contributor

Like it 👍

  • make the add/edit description button a secondary button?

Seems sensible yeah.

  • should I directly create an overflow button that takes add/edit description?

Could do, I do wonder how much benefit/use the 'Add description' button gets to warrant it existing - rather than just existing in the 'Configure' page.

  • also move the keep build forever to overflow?

Sounds good.

  • move the info about when the build started and how long it took to the left like e.g. the info about the cause.

Want to eventually move this section into its own extendable card (in a similar fashion to https://jenkins-redesign.vercel.app/project/build/375). I don't think the current summary components are the best use of space.

@mawinter69
Copy link
Contributor Author

Like it 👍

  • make the add/edit description button a secondary button?

Seems sensible yeah.

  • should I directly create an overflow button that takes add/edit description?

Could do, I do wonder how much benefit/use the 'Add description' button gets to warrant it existing - rather than just existing in the 'Configure' page.

  • also move the keep build forever to overflow?

Sounds good.

  • move the info about when the build started and how long it took to the left like e.g. the info about the cause.

Want to eventually move this section into its own extendable card (in a similar fashion to https://jenkins-redesign.vercel.app/project/build/375). I don't think the current summary components are the best use of space.

For now I only made the description button a secondary button.

- fix permission in job page
- don't show the button for built-in node
- improve jelly doc
@Kevin-CB Kevin-CB added security-approved @jenkinsci/core-security-review reviewed this PR for security issues and removed needs-security-review Awaiting review by a security team member labels May 28, 2024
@Kevin-CB
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM security wise

Copy link
Member

@timja timja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/label ready-for-merge


This PR is now ready for merge, after ~24 hours, we will merge it if there's no negative feedback.

Thanks!

@comment-ops-bot comment-ops-bot bot added the ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback label May 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted security-approved @jenkinsci/core-security-review reviewed this PR for security issues
Projects
None yet
6 participants