New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: Update ExpectAPI.md #11211
doc: Update ExpectAPI.md #11211
Conversation
Hi @ajubin! Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. Action RequiredIn order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@fb.com. Thanks! |
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Facebook open source project. Thanks! |
Hi, the CI failed for |
@orta is this correct? I keep getting confused byt how to properly do this 🙈 |
This originally was based on my work in svg-snapshots - it's possible that the Jest types have moved on since but I think the key difference is that mine is in a Mine assumes that you will have an |
Hi, actually on the doc it's a bit unclear how to do it. |
Sure, then I'd recommend switching the code back, and adding something like: - _Note_: In TypeScript, when using `@types/jest` for example, you can declare the new `toBeWithinRange` matcher like this:
+ _Note_: In TypeScript, when using `@types/jest` for example, you can declare the new `toBeWithinRange` matcher in the imported module like this: Which I think makes it clearer overall |
I'll do this :) What about the failing checks ? |
The fail is unrelated, this should be fine 👍🏻 |
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Update doc to add types for custom matchers
Fix : #10642
Summary
Motivation : Copy pasting documentation doesn't work, as mentioned here, #10642
Test plan