Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump slf4j to 2.0.0-alpha6 #7554

Closed

Conversation

joschi
Copy link
Contributor

@joschi joschi commented Feb 9, 2022

SLF4J 2.0.x series requires Java 8. It builds upon the 1.8.x series and adds a backward-compatible fluent logging api. By backward-compatible, we mean that existing logging frameworks do not have to be changed for the user to benefit from the fluent logging API. However, existing frameworks must migrate to the ServiceLoader mechanism. The resulting internal changes are detailed in the FAQ page.

  • SLF4J now ships with the slf4j-reload4j module delegating to the reload4j backend. Reload4j is a drop-in replacement for log4j version 1.2.17.
  • SimpleLogger now prints the thread Id if instructed to do so. This fixes SLF4J-499 requested by Michael Osipov

Signed-off-by: Jochen Schalanda jochen@schalanda.name

> SLF4J 2.0.x series requires Java 8. It builds upon the 1.8.x series and adds a backward-compatible fluent logging api. By backward-compatible, we mean that existing logging frameworks do not have to be changed for the user to benefit from the [fluent logging API](https://www.slf4j.org/manual.html#fluent). However, existing frameworks must migrate to the `ServiceLoader` mechanism. The resulting internal changes are [detailed](https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#changesInVersion200) in the FAQ page.
>
> - SLF4J now ships with the slf4j-reload4j module delegating to the reload4j backend. Reload4j is a drop-in replacement for log4j version 1.2.17.
> - `SimpleLogger` now prints the thread Id if instructed to do so. This fixes [SLF4J-499](https://jira.qos.ch/browse/SLF4J-499) requested by Michael Osipov

Signed-off-by: Jochen Schalanda <jochen@schalanda.name>
@olamy olamy added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Feb 9, 2022
@sbordet
Copy link
Contributor

sbordet commented Feb 9, 2022

We merge from 10 to 11, so this PR is not necessary, only #7555 is.

@sbordet sbordet closed this Feb 9, 2022
@joschi joschi deleted the slf4j-2.0.0-alpha6-jetty-11 branch February 9, 2022 12:24
@joakime
Copy link
Contributor

joakime commented Feb 9, 2022

This is now present on jetty-11.0.x branch as part of the merge commit 3917ae8

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants