New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I updated the base URI and included a Draft-specific info box section #673
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Welcome to the JSON Schema Community. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request!! 🎉🎉 We are so excited you are here! We hope this is only the first of many! For more details check out README.md file.
In 2020-09, Only URI-references without fragments are allowed; | ||
all other fragments in $id had undefined behavior previously. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We didn't discuss adding this and I'm not sure it belongs. This doesn't really address a change in behavior. This references something that was syntactically possible previously, but was entirely meaningless. The change was to forbid this syntax that didn't have any meaning anyway. For a reference at this level, I think this is a detail that's unnecessary to call out. It's fixing an inconsistency in the spec. I don't think users care about that.
Someone let me know if I'm missing something and there's a reason why this should be in UJS.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I thought of adding it because I was trying to show the difference between Draft 2020-12 and 2020-9, but I can remove it @jdesrosiers
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, please remove it
Hi @Dule-martins . We are almost done with the changes to merge this PR. Can you please review the last comments? |
I will do that later tonight, after work thank you
…On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 13:33, Benjamin Granados ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi @Dule-martins <https://github.com/Dule-martins> . We are almost done
with the changes to merge this PR. Can you please review the last comments?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#673 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH4ASUU3GMHYXK2KZUWJUGDZCSRQHAVCNFSM6AAAAABGTF7LU2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMJVGEZDSOJYGU>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
$ids
were changed to absolute URIs. A Draft-specific Info block that supports changing dialects in an embedded schema (using $schema with a different value than the parent schema) with an explanation of the difference between 2020-09 and 2020-12What kind of change does this PR introduce?
refactoring doc
Issue Number:
Screenshots/videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?