Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use new Poll class for filebrowser contents polling. #6305

Merged
merged 7 commits into from May 11, 2019
67 changes: 21 additions & 46 deletions packages/filebrowser/src/model.ts
Expand Up @@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ import {
IChangedArgs,
IStateDB,
PathExt,
PageConfig
PageConfig,
Poll
} from '@jupyterlab/coreutils';

import { IDocumentManager, shouldOverwrite } from '@jupyterlab/docmanager';
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -87,8 +88,7 @@ export class FileBrowserModel implements IDisposable {
format: 'text'
};
this._state = options.state || null;
this._baseRefreshDuration =
options.refreshInterval || DEFAULT_REFRESH_INTERVAL;
const refreshInterval = options.refreshInterval || DEFAULT_REFRESH_INTERVAL;

const { services } = options.manager;
services.contents.fileChanged.connect(this._onFileChanged, this);
Expand All @@ -103,8 +103,21 @@ export class FileBrowserModel implements IDisposable {
}
};
window.addEventListener('beforeunload', this._unloadEventListener);
this._scheduleUpdate();
this._startTimer();
this._poll = new Poll({
factory: async () => {
const date = new Date().getTime();
if (date - this._lastRefresh < MIN_REFRESH) {
return;
}
Copy link
Contributor

@jasongrout jasongrout May 4, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All of this logic can go away with the new Poll class, I think. It's sufficient to just call the update method. When we want to have the poll immediately refresh, we call the poll's refresh method.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, good point. It also does some logic around a minimum refresh interval, which I tried to keep intact.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We used to have a minimum interval option in Poll, but it didn't handle manual refreshes (it assumed a manual refresh was always immediate). Perhaps we add a minimum refresh interval to Poll for this debouncing. I think it would be pretty straightforward - the poll refresh() method would just schedule using logic like here.

So this logic isn't really a true debounce, in that it doesn't schedule a refresh according to MIN_REFRESH, it simply ignores requests if they are too soon after the last tick. That's perhaps a little frustrating - you click and click and click, and if you stop clicking before MIN_REFRESH, it's like you never clicked at all.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

actually, it's a bit more complicated for Poll, since we really want to debounce the callback (and every time we are about to call the callback, we check to see if we should go into standby, etc.). So that means the Poll should really be storing the last time it called the callback and make sure it's not calling the callback more often than it should.

return this.refresh();
},
frequency: {
interval: refreshInterval,
backoff: true,
max: 300 * 1000
},
standby: 'when-hidden'
});
}

/**
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -198,7 +211,7 @@ export class FileBrowserModel implements IDisposable {
}
window.removeEventListener('beforeunload', this._unloadEventListener);
this._isDisposed = true;
clearTimeout(this._timeoutId);
this._poll.dispose();
this._sessions.length = 0;
this._items.length = 0;
Signal.clearData(this);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -227,7 +240,6 @@ export class FileBrowserModel implements IDisposable {
*/
refresh(): Promise<void> {
this._lastRefresh = new Date().getTime();
this._requested = false;
return this.cd('.');
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -269,7 +281,6 @@ export class FileBrowserModel implements IDisposable {
if (this.isDisposed) {
return;
}
this._refreshDuration = this._baseRefreshDuration;
this._handleContents(contents);
this._pendingPath = null;
if (oldValue !== newValue) {
Expand All @@ -296,7 +307,6 @@ export class FileBrowserModel implements IDisposable {
this._connectionFailure.emit(error);
return this.cd('/');
} else {
this._refreshDuration = this._baseRefreshDuration * 10;
this._connectionFailure.emit(error);
}
});
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -586,7 +596,7 @@ export class FileBrowserModel implements IDisposable {

// If either the old value or the new value is in the current path, update.
if (value) {
this._scheduleUpdate();
this._poll.refresh();
ian-r-rose marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
this._populateSessions(sessions.running());
this._fileChanged.emit(change);
return;
Expand All @@ -605,38 +615,6 @@ export class FileBrowserModel implements IDisposable {
});
}

/**
* Start the internal refresh timer.
*/
private _startTimer(): void {
this._timeoutId = window.setInterval(() => {
if (this._requested) {
void this.refresh();
return;
}
if (document.hidden) {
// Don't poll when nobody's looking.
return;
}
let date = new Date().getTime();
if (date - this._lastRefresh > this._refreshDuration) {
void this.refresh();
}
}, MIN_REFRESH);
}

/**
* Handle internal model refresh logic.
*/
private _scheduleUpdate(): void {
let date = new Date().getTime();
if (date - this._lastRefresh > MIN_REFRESH) {
void this.refresh();
} else {
this._requested = true;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, so it actually was doing a debounce, in that if we tried to schedule an update too soon, it would note it and follow up with an update at some point in the future.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it was doing that.

Note, however, that the user clicking refresh() circumvents the polling all-together, so they get immediate feedback.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, the original intent was for the auto-poll to not happen too soon after a user or programmatically triggered poll.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then we should be okay with deleting the logic entirely, then. If a user clicking on the refresh button calls the poll refresh, the poll knows about the refresh and its interval starts over again.

}
}

private _connectionFailure = new Signal<this, Error>(this);
private _fileChanged = new Signal<this, Contents.IChangedArgs>(this);
private _items: Contents.IModel[] = [];
Expand All @@ -648,18 +626,15 @@ export class FileBrowserModel implements IDisposable {
private _pendingPath: string | null = null;
private _refreshed = new Signal<this, void>(this);
private _lastRefresh = -1;
private _requested = false;
private _sessions: Session.IModel[] = [];
private _state: IStateDB | null = null;
private _timeoutId = -1;
private _refreshDuration: number;
private _baseRefreshDuration: number;
private _driveName: string;
private _isDisposed = false;
private _restored = new PromiseDelegate<void>();
private _uploads: IUploadModel[] = [];
private _uploadChanged = new Signal<this, IChangedArgs<IUploadModel>>(this);
private _unloadEventListener: (e: Event) => string;
private _poll: Poll;
}

/**
Expand Down