Secret JWK k values larger than HMAC-SHA minimums
#909
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…arger than the identified HS* algorithm. This is allowed per https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7518#section-3.2: "A key of the same size as the hash output ... _or larger_ MUST be used with this algorithm" - Ensured that, when using the JwkBuilder, Secret JWK 'alg' values would automatically be set to 'HS256', 'HS384', or 'HS512' if the specified Java SecretKey algorithm name equals a JCA standard name (HmacSHA256, HmacSHA384, etc) or JCA standard HMAC-SHA OID. Fixes #901.
lhazlewood
changed the title
…arger than the identified HS* algorithm. This is allowed per https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7518#section-3.2: "A key of the same size as the hash output ... _or larger_ MUST be used with this algorithm" - Ensured that, when using the JwkBuilder, Secret JWK 'alg' values would automatically be set to 'HS256', 'HS384', or 'HS512' if the specified Java SecretKey algorithm name equals a JCA standard name (HmacSHA256, HmacSHA384, etc) or JCA standard HMAC-SHA OID. - Updated CHANGELOG.md accordingly.
lhazlewood
changed the title
k values larger than HMAC-SHA minimums
lhazlewood
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2024
- Ensured Secret JWK 'k' byte arrays for HMAC-SHA algorithms can be larger than the identified HS* algorithm. This is allowed per https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7518#section-3.2: "A key of the same size as the hash output ... _or larger_ MUST be used with this algorithm" - Ensured that, when using the JwkBuilder, Secret JWK 'alg' values would automatically be set to 'HS256', 'HS384', or 'HS512' if the specified Java SecretKey algorithm name equals a JCA standard name (HmacSHA256, HmacSHA384, etc) or JCA standard HMAC-SHA OID. - Updated CHANGELOG.md accordingly. Fixes #905
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ensured Secret JWK 'k' byte arrays for HMAC-SHA algorithms can be larger than the identified HS* algorithm. This is allowed per https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7518#section-3.2: "A key of the same size as the hash output ... or larger MUST be used with this algorithm"
Ensured that, when using the JwkBuilder, Secret JWK 'alg' values would automatically be set to 'HS256', 'HS384', or 'HS512' if the specified Java SecretKey algorithm name equals a JCA standard name (HmacSHA256, HmacSHA384, etc) or JCA standard HMAC-SHA OID.
Updated CHANGELOG.md accordingly.
Fixes #905