feat: stop multiarch images being lost on re tagging docker images

[tobybatch]

Description

When we re-tag docker images we loose the arm64 versions of the multi arch

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist

• I verified that my code applies to the guidelines (composer code-check)
• I updated the documentation (see here)
• I agree that this code is used in Kimai (see license)

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[tobybatch]

@Not-Code do you see a draw back over this? It's a stack overflow fix, I've not used it before.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71470604/re-tagging-multi-arch-docker-image

[kevinpapst]

Probably not the right place, but have you seen that the base images built in about 18 minutes? So far less problematic than the expected two hours: https://github.com/kimai/kimai/actions/workflows/docker-base.yaml

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.78%. Comparing base (e042ef6) to head (a6f9700).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #4856   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     87.77%   87.78%           
  Complexity     8963     8963           
=========================================
  Files           797      797           
  Lines         29414    29414           
=========================================
+ Hits          25819    25820    +1     
+ Misses         3595     3594    -1     

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

[tobybatch]

@kevinpapst I'll build an all in one workflow that we can test for timing. I'm looking at caching in builds at work ATM as well.

[kevinpapst]

I never used any of those actions 🤷 ... so 👍 😁

The only things that jump in my eyes are:

• we have a lot of redundant tags
• why do we install Install buildx in the step before at line 22 if we don't use it afterwards?

[kevinpapst]

Is this ready? Having the arm64 version would be great actually and I want to create a new release.

Does this superseed #4592 ?