Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix IMC metrics for transport encryption #7904

Merged

Conversation

pierDipi
Copy link
Member

@pierDipi pierDipi commented May 8, 2024

Rather than reporting metrics (and scheme tag) as an aggregate for all subscriptions, we will report them for each individual subscription with the correct subscriber's scheme.

@pierDipi pierDipi requested a review from Cali0707 May 8, 2024 08:38
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 8, 2024
Rather than reporting metrics as an aggregate for all subscriptions,
we will report them for each individual subscription and based
on the target scheme.

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <pierdipi@redhat.com>
@pierDipi pierDipi force-pushed the KNATIVE-7871_Fix-imc-https-metrics branch from ddd0b16 to 75f7abd Compare May 8, 2024 08:59
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.20%. Comparing base (7e1c082) to head (75f7abd).
Report is 42 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7904      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.22%   69.20%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         339      341       +2     
  Lines       19494    15802    -3692     
==========================================
- Hits        13494    10935    -2559     
+ Misses       5337     4196    -1141     
- Partials      663      671       +8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@Cali0707 Cali0707 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 8, 2024
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented May 8, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Cali0707, pierDipi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@pierDipi
Copy link
Member Author

pierDipi commented May 9, 2024

/test reconciler-tests

@Cali0707 Cali0707 linked an issue May 10, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@Cali0707
Copy link
Member

/test reconciler-tests

1 similar comment
@Cali0707
Copy link
Member

/test reconciler-tests

@knative-prow knative-prow bot merged commit 58d7920 into knative:main May 14, 2024
33 of 38 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

How to handle multiple request schemes in metrics
2 participants