-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 623
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
moving the Maven coordinates up #7
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I think this information is very important and searched frequently, so it should be near the top of the page.
ajalt
referenced
this pull request
in ajalt/kotlintest
Jul 13, 2018
The current string shrink algorithm generates candidates by dropping single characters from the end of the input. This doesn't produce the smallest case, since it doesn't drop characters from the start of the string. It is also linear on the size of the input, so it requires a potentially large number of tries to reach the result it does produce. This PR changes to algorithm to bisect the input string from both directions, producing a minimal output in log n tries. As an example of the current behavior, the test: `forAll { it: String -> !it.contains("#") }` produces output like this: ``` Attempting to shrink failed arg DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) e|Gr+ tri7jw{ Shrink #1: <empty string> pass Shrink #2: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) e|Gr+ tri7 fail Shrink #3: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) e|Gr+ fail Shrink #4: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) fail Shrink #5: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQx fail Shrink #6: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k fail Shrink #7: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x, fail Shrink #8: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B* fail Shrink #9: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn fail Shrink #10: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2 fail Shrink #11: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M# fail Shrink #12: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$ pass Shrink #13: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$F pass Shrink #14: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz pass Shrink #15: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz; pass Shrink #16: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M pass Shrink #17: aaaaaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$ pass Shrink #18: aaaaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$F pass Shrink #19: aaaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz pass Shrink #20: aaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz; pass Shrink #21: aDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M pass Shrink result => DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M# ``` This is 21 attempts to produce a string 32x longer than optimal. The new algorithm produces output like this: ``` Attempting to shrink failed arg t ^j>t\o,x3?eb9#F'>g>vGQ-N}nkx Shrink #1: <empty string> pass Shrink #2: t ^j>t\o,x3?eb9 pass Shrink #3: #F'>g>vGQ-N}nkx fail Shrink #4: #F'>g>vG fail Shrink #5: #F'> fail Shrink #6: #F fail Shrink #7: # fail Shrink result => # ``` This is only 7 tries, and produces the correct output of `"#"`
sksamuel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 15, 2018
The current string shrink algorithm generates candidates by dropping single characters from the end of the input. This doesn't produce the smallest case, since it doesn't drop characters from the start of the string. It is also linear on the size of the input, so it requires a potentially large number of tries to reach the result it does produce. This PR changes to algorithm to bisect the input string from both directions, producing a minimal output in log n tries. As an example of the current behavior, the test: `forAll { it: String -> !it.contains("#") }` produces output like this: ``` Attempting to shrink failed arg DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) e|Gr+ tri7jw{ Shrink #1: <empty string> pass Shrink #2: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) e|Gr+ tri7 fail Shrink #3: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) e|Gr+ fail Shrink #4: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) fail Shrink #5: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQx fail Shrink #6: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k fail Shrink #7: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x, fail Shrink #8: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B* fail Shrink #9: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn fail Shrink #10: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2 fail Shrink #11: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M# fail Shrink #12: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$ pass Shrink #13: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$F pass Shrink #14: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz pass Shrink #15: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz; pass Shrink #16: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M pass Shrink #17: aaaaaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$ pass Shrink #18: aaaaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$F pass Shrink #19: aaaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz pass Shrink #20: aaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz; pass Shrink #21: aDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M pass Shrink result => DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M# ``` This is 21 attempts to produce a string 32x longer than optimal. The new algorithm produces output like this: ``` Attempting to shrink failed arg t ^j>t\o,x3?eb9#F'>g>vGQ-N}nkx Shrink #1: <empty string> pass Shrink #2: t ^j>t\o,x3?eb9 pass Shrink #3: #F'>g>vGQ-N}nkx fail Shrink #4: #F'>g>vG fail Shrink #5: #F'> fail Shrink #6: #F fail Shrink #7: # fail Shrink result => # ``` This is only 7 tries, and produces the correct output of `"#"`
sksamuel
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I think this information is very important and searched frequently, so it should be near the top of the page.