Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

🌱 Refactor typed_client and unstructured_client to be consistent #1795

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 26, 2022
Merged

🌱 Refactor typed_client and unstructured_client to be consistent #1795

merged 1 commit into from Sep 26, 2022

Conversation

hyschumi
Copy link
Contributor

@hyschumi hyschumi commented Feb 8, 2022 •
edited

this pr just update some code , make unstructured_client and typed_client have same code style.
i think the code will be more readable for users.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 8, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @hyschumi!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Feb 8, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @hyschumi. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 8, 2022
@hyschumi hyschumi changed the title refactor: client keep same code style 🐛 refactor: client keep same code style Feb 8, 2022
@hyschumi hyschumi closed this Feb 8, 2022
@hyschumi hyschumi changed the title 🐛 refactor: client keep same code style ✨ refactor: client keep same code style Feb 8, 2022
@hyschumi hyschumi reopened this Feb 8, 2022
@FillZpp
Copy link
Contributor

FillZpp commented Feb 9, 2022

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 9, 2022
@hyschumi
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@hyschumi
Copy link
Contributor Author

hyschumi commented Mar 8, 2022

/assign @grantr

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@hyschumi: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: grantr.

Note that only kubernetes-sigs members, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time.
For more information please see the contributor guide

In response to this:

/assign @grantr

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

AlmogBaku
AlmogBaku approved these changes Mar 21, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@AlmogBaku AlmogBaku left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@AlmogBaku: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

LGTM

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@AlmogBaku AlmogBaku mentioned this pull request Apr 1, 2022
Closed
9 tasks
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 19, 2022
@AlmogBaku
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 21, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 21, 2022
@FillZpp
Copy link
Contributor

FillZpp commented Jul 22, 2022

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Jul 22, 2022
@AlmogBaku
Copy link
Member

/assign @alvaroaleman

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

vincepri
vincepri approved these changes Sep 26, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@vincepri vincepri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AlmogBaku, hyschumi, vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 26, 2022
@vincepri
Copy link
Member

/retitle 🌱 Refactor typed_client and unstructured_client to be consistent

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title ✨ refactor: client keep same code style 🌱 Refactor typed_client and unstructured_client to be consistent Sep 26, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 09e83d3 into kubernetes-sigs:master Sep 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@AlmogBaku AlmogBaku AlmogBaku approved these changes

@vincepri vincepri vincepri approved these changes

@gerred gerred Awaiting requested review from gerred

@pwittrock pwittrock Awaiting requested review from pwittrock

Assignees

@AlmogBaku AlmogBaku

@vincepri vincepri

@sbueringer sbueringer

@alvaroaleman alvaroaleman

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
8 participants
@hyschumi @k8s-ci-robot @FillZpp @k8s-triage-robot @AlmogBaku @sbueringer @vincepri @alvaroaleman