Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use signer interface for certificate creation #69329

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 3, 2018
Merged

use signer interface for certificate creation #69329

merged 1 commit into from Oct 3, 2018

Conversation

mrIncompetent
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:
Use crypto.Signer interface for certificate functions to allow different kind of private keys (for example: ecdsa)

Release note:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 2, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 2, 2018
@mrIncompetent
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @alvaroaleman

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Oct 2, 2018

/kind feature
/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 2, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
but I'll defer to @liggitt for he's the cert guru here :)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 2, 2018
@mrIncompetent
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-100-performance

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Oct 2, 2018

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 2, 2018
@yliaog
Copy link
Contributor

yliaog commented Oct 2, 2018

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: liggitt, mrIncompetent, soltysh, yliaog

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 0509eea into kubernetes:master Oct 3, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants