Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reevaluate using SendGrid for sending release announcement emails #3175

Open
xmudrii opened this issue Jul 26, 2023 · 9 comments
Open

Reevaluate using SendGrid for sending release announcement emails #3175

xmudrii opened this issue Jul 26, 2023 · 9 comments
Labels
area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. needs-priority sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release.

Comments

@xmudrii
Copy link
Member

xmudrii commented Jul 26, 2023

What would you like to be added:

Lately SendGrid hasn't been very reliable for sending release announcement emails using krel announce

We're often facing problems such as:

  • Emails not getting delivered to all mailing lists (lately they're getting delivered only to k-announce)
  • Folks having random issues with their SendGrid account
  • SendGrid deactivating account after some time of inactivity requiring a new account to be created

We should consider:

  • If we can fix those issues with SendGrid
  • If there are any other offerings that provide better user experience for our use case

Why is this needed:

It's important that the Release Managers can reliably send release announcement emails after cutting releases as many end users and Kubernetes developers depend on these emails.

@xmudrii xmudrii added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject labels Jul 26, 2023
@xmudrii
Copy link
Member Author

xmudrii commented Jul 26, 2023

@ameukam
Copy link
Member

ameukam commented Jul 26, 2023

AWS Simple Email Service looks like a great alternative.

@jimangel
Copy link
Member

jimangel commented Jul 26, 2023

I mentioned in Slack, but for record, I plan on seeing how challenging it would be to implement using a Google app password - which could be a good bridge to using a more robust approach (SES/group sending/etc). I'm reluctant to assign myself if others want to look at a more permanent approach - but keep me in the loop please!

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

I'm in favor of switching to something more suitable 👍

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Jul 28, 2023

i like the idea to use the aws email service!
we also can use the patch notify that i was working and need to complete 😅

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 25, 2024
@xmudrii
Copy link
Member Author

xmudrii commented Jan 25, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 25, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 24, 2024
@xmudrii
Copy link
Member Author

xmudrii commented Apr 24, 2024

/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Apr 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. needs-priority sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants