Correct link for removed feature gate

[Atomsoldat]

The LegacyServiceAccountTokenNoAutoGeneration feature gate has been removed and no longer appears in the list of deprecated feature gates as a result of that. When talking about this feature gate, content/en/docs/concepts/security/service-accounts.md still links to the list of deprecated feature gates.

I think it would be better if the link pointed to the list of removed feature gates, where this feature gate actually appears; hence this request.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: Atomsoldat (bd6541b)

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @Atomsoldat!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/website 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/website has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[netlify]

✅ Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	bd6541b
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/66404ebfc9a5320008b6bb32
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-46311--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[stmcginnis]

Since the feature gate this text requires is now removed, I think this section may need to be reworked rather than pointing to old information. Could you look at that instead?

We do need a signed CLA to accept any changes, so that will need to be done before any PRs can be accepted. If you have any questions not answered by the links provided from the bot, please do ask here or in Slack.

[tengqm]

This version range can be made more specific.

[Atomsoldat]

The feature gate is removed in the current versions, but not in old ones. That is how I stumbled upon the outdated link, because I was upgrading from 1.26. So i think it is still useful to have information about it, at least for a while. I have tried to clarify the version ranges and rewrote some of the prose to be more helpful in my opinion.

@stmcginnis I can rewrite the text further, but then it would be good to know what you would consider appropriate.

[tengqm]

/lgtm
The message is clear and accurate.

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: d7a50800b202de1e82326bd7a412fe87095cb1e2

[salaxander]

/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: salaxander

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• content/en/OWNERS [salaxander]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment