Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor and Improve Code for Kubescape Version Compatibility Check #1494

Merged

Conversation

cbrom
Copy link
Contributor

@cbrom cbrom commented Nov 22, 2023

PR Type:

Refactoring


PR Description:

This PR includes the following changes:

  • Refactored the isRuleKubescapeVersionCompatible function in core/cautils/datastructuresmethods.go to use type switch for better readability and error handling.
  • Fixed a test case in core/cautils/versioncheck_test.go that was running twice with the same parameters.

PR Main Files Walkthrough:

files:
  • core/cautils/datastructuresmethods.go: Refactored the isRuleKubescapeVersionCompatible function to use type switch for handling the useFromKubescapeVersion and useUntilKubescapeVersion attributes. This improves readability and provides better error handling when these attributes are not strings.
  • core/cautils/versioncheck_test.go: Fixed a test case that was running twice with the same parameters. Now, the test case runs with different parameters as intended.

Copy link
Contributor

@matthyx matthyx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

much more readable, thanks!

@matthyx
Copy link
Contributor

matthyx commented Nov 23, 2023

/review

@matthyx
Copy link
Contributor

matthyx commented Nov 23, 2023

/describe

Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Improving type assertion in the function isRuleKubescapeVersionCompatible and fixing a test case.
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR improves the type assertion in the function isRuleKubescapeVersionCompatible by using a switch case instead of if-else. It also fixes a test case where the same test was run twice.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, because the changes are straightforward and limited to a single function and a test case.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The changes made in this PR are clear and improve the readability of the code. However, it would be beneficial to add more test cases to ensure the function behaves as expected in all scenarios.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

How to use

Instructions

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
/add_docs: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
/generate_labels: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
see the tools guide for more details.

To edit any configuration parameter from the configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value.
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Code Improvement on isRuleKubescapeVersionCompatible function Refactor and Improve Code for Kubescape Version Compatibility Check Nov 23, 2023
@matthyx matthyx merged commit cb78723 into kubescape:master Nov 23, 2023
8 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants