[libc][errno] Remove previously added errno numbers #92163
Conversation
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libc Author: Robin Caloudis (robincaloudis) ChangesIntroduced in #91150. Not needed anymore as #92041 fixed the root cause. Post mortem: Due to the previously missing inclusion of Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92163.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/generic-error-number-macros.h b/libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/generic-error-number-macros.h
index b5b1b676dacc3..7ee0352669b8a 100644
--- a/libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/generic-error-number-macros.h
+++ b/libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/generic-error-number-macros.h
@@ -44,7 +44,5 @@
#define EDOM 33
#define ERANGE 34
#define EILSEQ 35
-#define ENAMETOOLONG 36
-#define EOVERFLOW 75
#endif // LLVM_LIBC_MACROS_GENERIC_ERROR_NUMBER_MACROS_H
|
robincaloudis
changed the title
|
You are welcome. Do you mind merging this PR? I still lack write access. |
robincaloudis
force-pushed
the
rc-rm-errno-numbers
branch
from
37e4df4
to
81fb3c0
Compare
Introduced in llvm#91150. Not needed anymore as llvm#92041 fixed the root cause. `ENAMETOOLONG` and `EOVERFLOW` are well defined in `<linux/errno.h>`. Post mortem: Due to the previously missing inclusion of `<linux/errno.h>` (fixed with llvm#92041), I misinterpreted an undefined macro issue during the development of llvm#91150 as being caused by a missing definition rather than by the missing inclusion of the linux header. I realized too late that `ENAMETOOLONG` and `EOVERFLOW` were correctly defined in `<linux/errno.h>` and that it was my missing inclusion that caused the problem.
Introduced in #91150. Not needed anymore as #92041 fixed the root cause.
ENAMETOOLONGandEOVERFLOWare well defined in<linux/errno.h>.Post mortem: Due to the previously missing inclusion of
<linux/errno.h>(fixed with #92041), I misinterpreted an undefined macro issue during the development of #91150 as being caused by a missing definition rather than by the missing inclusion of the linux header. I realized too late thatENAMETOOLONGandEOVERFLOWwere correctly defined in<linux/errno.h>and that it was my missing inclusion that caused the problem.