Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Remove macOS universal build #217

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kosticmarin
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Release separate binaries for x86_64 and aarch64

This was done in order to fix issues with existing universal binary which does not work on some macOS systems.
Some people reported the following issue exec format error: lunatic.

@bkolobara I'm not sure how to test this without creating a tag?

- Release separate binaries for x86_64 and aarch64
@bkolobara
Copy link
Contributor

I never figured out a way to test this without actually pushing to the repository.

Creating tags should be fine, as it only creates a "draft release" that we don't need to publish. I think you should be able to see draft releases with your repository permissions.

@kosticmarin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kosticmarin commented Aug 23, 2023

@bkolobara Every thing looks good! Can You try out the new binaries on macOS, to see if the problems format are gone?

After we can delete the draft builds.

PS. Ignore the deny checks 😄

@bkolobara
Copy link
Contributor

It works!

But it also bundles the whole target directory structure. We should probably just include the binary at the top level, like on linux and windows.

I just remembered that we also have a hombrew formula that is automatically updated when a release is triggered. I couldn't find examples of formulas that have both arm and x64 binaries in it. With the universal build we always pointed to the same, but am unsure how it would work now.

@kosticmarin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ok, great catch I'll remove the directory structure!

Also I'll check what we can do about hombrew and how we can improve release there.

@kosticmarin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I've fixed the directory structure when we package macOS builds.

Also I've checked some of the most popular rust project and how they are installed using Homebrew. Most of them are using cargo and installing from source via-a github release archive.

Here are some of the examples:

In short all their formula depend on depends_on "rust" => :build and they just run system "cargo", "install".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants