Allow no comment for a constructor where needed #440
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ihor-sviziev
approved these changes
Apr 12, 2023
m2-community-project
bot
moved this from Ready for Review
to Reviewer Approved
in Pull Request Progress
m2-community-project
bot
added
Progress: approved
and removed
Progress: ready for review
labels
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While working on magento/magento2#37020, I noticed that the Magento coding standard was requiring a docblock comment for the following constructor:
https://github.com/magento/magento2/blob/322047d01d98b584892c6058ed93c5bf6715add8/lib/internal/Magento/Framework/Data/Tree.php#L28-L33
Typically there is no 'short description' required for constructors, but a docblock listing each
@paramis required (even if it's purely a duplicate of what PHP says, but that's a separate issue/gripe). However, as this particular constructor does not have any parameters, I consider the requirement for a docblock an error.This pull request adds a special case for the
__construct()method to avoid a useless (or empty) comment being added.