rem() - New CSS functional notation
#23183
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Preview URLs Flaws (1)URL:
(comment last updated: 2023-01-03 14:00:47) |
10 tasks
StyleShit
reviewed
Dec 30, 2022
Co-authored-by: StyleShit <32631382+StyleShit@users.noreply.github.com>
StyleShit
reviewed
Dec 31, 2022
estelle
reviewed
Jan 2, 2023
Co-authored-by: Estelle Weyl <estelle@openwebdocs.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Document the CSS
rem()functional notation.Motivation
Safari 15.4 already supports this CSS function.
Firefox 109 adds support for this CSS function.
Additional details
https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css-values/#funcdef-mod
Related issues and pull requests
rem()compatibility data browser-compat-data#18480