Prefer more f-strings and non-printf-style format #2223
+180
−410
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Avasam
commented
Mar 24, 2024
Avasam
commented
Mar 25, 2024
ruff.toml
Outdated
|
|
||
| [lint.per-file-ignores] | ||
| # TODO: Make adodbapi changes in their own PRs | ||
| "adodbapi/*" = ["ISC", "UP"] |
Run updated f-string format checks Use ruff to prevent regressions And a few manual changes needed for checks to pass
Avasam
force-pushed
the
pyupgrade-checks-with-ruff
branch
from
9e1111a
to
905d359
Compare
…rade-checks-with-ruff
…rade-checks-with-ruff
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #2122
Done by running
ruff check --fix --select=ISC,FLY,G,UP --ignore=ISC003,UP015,UP038