add distinction between func() and .func()
#801
+2
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Allows this kind of theme highlighting   All tests pass once generated
sheetalkamat
force-pushed
the
master
branch
7 times, most recently
from
38ce771
to
0e1f58e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add the
entity.name.function.property.tsscope to allow this kind of theme highlightingThe scope was chosen to be consistent with
variable.other.object->variable.other.object.propertysince there's no real standard scope for method-calls.All local tests pass once generated. I maintain VS Code's upstream for C++ TextMate grammar so I'm confident these changes won't cause breakages.