Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

in operator typeguard can widen types #46403

Closed
wants to merge 86 commits into from
Closed

in operator typeguard can widen types #46403

wants to merge 86 commits into from

Conversation

marekdedic
Copy link
Contributor

@marekdedic marekdedic commented Oct 17, 2021

Fixes #21732

This PR is a continuation of #39746 - thanks @ShuiRuTian for his work. I have made the branch up-to-date with main and fixed new test breakages. As I am not the original author of most of the changes, I would greatly appreciate a review either from @ShuiRuTian or the maintainers of TS.

Submission containing materials of a third party: @ShuiRuTian

Please verify that:

  • There is an associated issue in the Backlog milestone (required)
  • Code is up-to-date with the main branch
  • You've successfully run gulp runtests locally
  • There are new or updated unit tests validating the change

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 17, 2021

CLA assistant check
All CLA requirements met.

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added the For Backlog Bug PRs that fix a backlog bug label Oct 17, 2021
@marekdedic marekdedic changed the title in operator typeguard now can widen types in operator typeguard can widen types Oct 17, 2021
@marekdedic
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have signed the CLA, however, I have no idea what to do with the code that is not my own - my layman's interpretation of the CLA is that if @ShuiRuTian signed the CLA as well, than it should all be OK. However, I can't check that he did.

@marekdedic marekdedic marked this pull request as draft October 17, 2021 17:26
@marekdedic
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi, @weswigham
thanks for the tips, I've used one and have some question about the other. Could you please take a look at the comments about the src/compiler/typeTests.ts file by @jakebailey? I'd like to resolve that :)

@sandersn sandersn moved this from Waiting on author to Waiting on reviewers in PR Backlog Mar 29, 2022
@HolgerJeromin
Copy link
Contributor

superseded by #50666 ?

@marekdedic
Copy link
Contributor Author

marekdedic commented Sep 20, 2022

Yes, superseded. For some (unsolicited) feedback, it's a pretty demotivating contributor experience to have a PR sit and wait for feedback/merge for half a year only to be re-implemented and superseded by a different PR from a project member.

With that said, the other PR is pretty clearly much more expansive and definitely an improvement over this one...

@marekdedic marekdedic closed this Sep 20, 2022
PR Backlog automation moved this from Waiting on reviewers to Done Sep 20, 2022
@marekdedic marekdedic deleted the in-operator-add-property branch September 20, 2022 07:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
For Backlog Bug PRs that fix a backlog bug
Projects
PR Backlog
  
Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Suggestion: treat in operator as type guard which asserts property existence
7 participants