Experiment: enable USO and disable software checksums in winxdp #3809
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3809 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 80.42% 86.58% +6.16%
==========================================
Files 56 56
Lines 15694 16543 +849
==========================================
+ Hits 12622 14324 +1702
+ Misses 3072 2219 -853
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Estimate the best case performance of generic XDP on Windows with hardware USO, hardware checksums, and nearly zero-copy TX.
Testing
Absolutely none. I expect functional tests based on duonic will break, but hopefully the perf tests pass and produce a nice number.
Documentation
Experiment.