Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename urdca-2015-canon to rdfc-1-0 #328

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 16, 2023
Merged

Conversation

peacekeeper
Copy link
Contributor

The W3C RDF Dataset Canonicalization and Hash Working Group has decided that the name of the algorithm should be RDFC-1.0. We therefore request that this be updated in this table.

See these links for more context:

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Jun 13, 2023

Seems fine to me, but we should ping folks from #261 to make sure we're not stepping on toes too hard with the straight name change here: @dmitrizagidulin, @dlongley, @msporny, @gobengo, @RangerMauve

table.csv Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@dmitrizagidulin dmitrizagidulin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 from me, thanks.

@BigLep
Copy link

BigLep commented Sep 5, 2023

@peacekeeper: are you able to incorporate PR feedback so this can be merged?

@peacekeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oops sorry this took so long. I incorporated the feedback, should be ready now I think.

peacekeeper and others added 3 commits November 16, 2023 15:07
Co-authored-by: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
@vmx
Copy link
Member

vmx commented Nov 16, 2023

A majority for people involved is happy. I had to rebase it, but the change is identical. I'm merging this now. Thanks everyone for diving into this and the previous issue around this.

@vmx vmx merged commit f099a91 into multiformats:master Nov 16, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants