Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Change getRepositoryToken provider generation to use getEntityManagerToken instead of getConnectionToken #1820

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

edeesis
Copy link

@edeesis edeesis commented Nov 27, 2023

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Changes the repository provider instantiation to use EntityManager instead of connection, allowing easier overriding.

Issue Number: #1819

What is the new behavior?

With this change, you can now override the EntityManager provider and retrieve repositories directly from there, allowing you to, for instance, start a transaction, and re-use that EntityManager instance for all inject points.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

This change will make Repository generation use getEntityManagerToken instead of getConnectionToken

closes nestjs#1819
@edeesis
Copy link
Author

edeesis commented Jan 8, 2024

@kamilmysliwiec Can this be considered for merge?

@kamilmysliwiec
Copy link
Member

Thanks for your contribution @edeesis! While this is a great change and step forward, I'm afraid we should postpone merging this PR till the next major release since it sorts of introduces a breaking change (may break existing projects).

@edeesis
Copy link
Author

edeesis commented Jan 9, 2024

Sounds good to me! No problem

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants