Skip to content

nitin-bommi/Computer-Based-Optimization-Techniques

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

71 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Revised simplex

To find the inverse of intermediate matrices, two approaches are used with time compexities O(n) and O(n2) respectively.

Libraries used

  • time
  • sympy (sub-modules)

SymPy is a Python library for symbolic mathematics. Since a number of variables are used (x1, x2...) this library provides efficient way of interpreting the variales for computation. It supports formatted matrix printing, easy interpretation of matrices, its inverse and sub-matrices.

The time is started after all the libraries are imported and before the function definition. It is stopped at the end of the program after some interations. The overall time is interpreted in milli-seconds as it is an interpretable scale for such computations.

How the input is taken?

The input file can be viewed here.

The text under '***' is viewed as comment and it represents the format of the input with some examples (along with solutions). The code checks for the type of the problem (i.e., minimisation or maximisation) and then computes the result.

The problem to be solved has to be appended below the final '***'. And it should contain the type of the problem and the constraints.

Once the file is read, it checks for the lines below the final '***' and then converts that into matrices form by a library linear_eq_to_matrix on which computations are performed. This library takes input in the form of equations and converts them into matrices of coefficients.

Output

With the help of SymPy, the output is formatted in matrix form.

When the input is taken as:

Maximize: z = 5x1+4x2

s.t.

6x1 + 4x2 ≤ 24

x1 + 2x2 ≤ 6

-x1 + x2 ≤ 1

x2 ≤ 2

The matrices A, b, c are printed as:

The output and intermediate matrix after each iteration is printed:

Time complexity

When we found the inverse using both the functions on the same matrix. The following results were obtained:

  • Elementary method:
def inverse1(mat,entering,leaving):
    
    dim = mat.shape[0]
    
    X = mat.row(leaving)/mat.row(leaving)[entering]
    mat.row_del(leaving)
    mat = mat.row_insert(leaving,X)
    
    for j in range(dim):
        if(leaving!=j):
            con=mat.row(j)[entering]
            X = mat.row(j)-mat.row(leaving)*con
            mat.row_del(j)
            mat = mat.row_insert(j,X)
            
    return mat

The execution time was 0.9977817 ms

  • Gauss Jordan method:
def inverse2(A):
    
    size = A.shape[0]
    
    B = eye(size)
    
    for x in range(0,size):
        V = B*A.col(x)
        W = V*1
        item = V[x]
        for y in range(0,size):
            if item != 0:
                if y == x:
                    W[y] = 1/item
                else:
                    W[y] =- V[y]/item
                    
        T = B*1
        T.row_del(x)
        T = T*1
        B = T.row_insert(x,zeros(1,size)) + (W*B.row(x))
        
    return B

The execution time was 3.027201 ms

i.e., Elementary method is ~3.1 times faster.

Justification - In elementary method, we used a single for loop whereas in gauss jordan method we used two for loops. (O(n) vs O(n2))