Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vote on primordials in error path #1158

Merged
merged 25 commits into from Feb 23, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
157 changes: 157 additions & 0 deletions votes/2022-02-21-0.json
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
{
"description": "Do we want to make code in the error path tamper proof (and how tamper proof do we want it to be)?",
"refs": [
"https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/pull/1158"
],
"outcome": {
"winner(s)": [
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression."
]
},
"votes": {
"aduh95": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 1,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 2,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": -1,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 0,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 0,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": -2
},
"BethGriggs": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 1,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 1,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 1,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 3,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 3,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 3
},
"BridgeAR": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 0,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 70,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 80,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 88
},
"cjihrig": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 0,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 0,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 0,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 0
},
"danielleadams": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 0,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 0,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 0,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 0
},
aduh95 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
"gireeshpunathil": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 5,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 3,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 4,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 1,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 2,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 0
},
"jasnell": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": -1,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 0,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 0,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": -1,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": -1
},
"joyeecheung": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 3,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 1,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 0,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 2,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 2,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 0
},
"mcollina": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 2,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 1,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 10,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 3,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 0
},
"mhdawson": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 0,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 5,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 0,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 4
},
"mmarchini": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 0,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 0,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 0,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 0
},
"MylesBorins": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 0,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 0,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 0,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 0
},
"RaisinTen": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": -1,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 0,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": -1,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 1,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 1
},
"richardlau": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 2,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 0,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 1,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 0,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 0
},
"ronag": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 3,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 1,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 2,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 4,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 5
},
"targos": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 3,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 3,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 2,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 1,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 0
},
"tniessen": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": -1,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": -1,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 0,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": -1,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 0
},
"Trott": {
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by porting it away from JS/main thread (while we are waiting for a PR doing this, primordials should be used).": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials.": 0,
"Make the code in the error path full tamper proof by using primordials + a build step to use bind-this proposal syntax.": 0,
"Use primordials in the error path only if there are no significant perf regression.": 0,
"Don't use primordials for prototype methods (and undo existing ones) in the error path, keep using them otherwise.": 0,
"Don't use any primordials (and undo existing ones) in the error path.": 0
}
}
}
aduh95 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved