chore: add jest to lookup #728

SimenB · 2019-05-10T15:22:56Z

We've had a release, so in theory the color issue should be solved. We've sped up our own CI by skipping the TypeScript build, should probably make the same change here. For now I just thread through a way higher timeout.

I haven't run this locally, I just figured I'd open up the PR before being computerless for the weekend. 🤞

Fixes #684

Checklist

npm test passes
tests are included
documentation is changed or added
contribution guidelines followed
here

targos · 2019-05-10T16:04:17Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker-pipeline/71/

codecov-io · 2019-05-10T16:17:17Z

Codecov Report

Merging #728 (bfaba7a) into main (d0185d9) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #728   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.12%   96.12%           
=======================================
  Files          31       31           
  Lines         929      930    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits          893      894    +1     
  Misses         36       36

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
lib/grab-project.js	`92.00% <100.00%> (+0.16%)`	⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d0185d9...bfaba7a. Read the comment docs.

targos · 2019-05-10T16:18:14Z

The TypeScript build took almost 10 minutes in CI. Is that expected?

18:08:23 verbose: jest yarn-install:  | Building TypeScript definition files
18:08:23 verbose: jest yarn-install:  | Building..................................................................
18:17:06 verbose: jest yarn-install:  | DONE

SimenB · 2019-05-10T16:21:13Z

Woah, not that much. More like 3.

We should skip it regardless, but weird it's that high

BridgeAR · 2019-05-11T11:26:16Z

The tests still seem to fail due to jest dependencies not working properly? I am on my phone, so it would be good if someone else would verify that.

SimenB · 2019-05-11T11:28:11Z

We have a failure due to https://github.com/TooTallNate/node-weak not compiling on node 12, should probably skip master and 12 until we figure something out.

jestjs/jest#8411
jestjs/jest#8397

Not sure about the optipng-bin thing on windows.

Besides that, looks like we need mercurial installed and figure out the enametoolong thing. Ideas on that one?

targos · 2019-05-11T11:30:24Z

I'm running locally with Node 10

BridgeAR · 2019-05-11T11:30:58Z

@SimenB sounds good to me! I suggest to keep the other module in that case. Otherwise some breaking changes might not be detected.

targos · 2019-05-11T11:38:05Z

First problem: it depends on Mercurial being installed on the host.

targos · 2019-05-11T11:51:50Z

One error remains after installing hg:

verbose: jest npm-test:      |   ● gets changed files for hg
verbose:                     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

verbose:                     | Command failed: hg status -amnu --rev min((!public() & ::.)+.)^ /tmp/1c37a264-9b80-4620-9839-67106cadda8b/npm_config_tmp/jest-changed-files-test-dir /tmp/1c37a264-9b80-4620-9839-67106cadda8b/npm_config_tmp/jest-changed-files-test-dir/nes
ted-dir /
verbose:                     | abort: empty revision range                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

verbose:                     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
verbose:                     |       at makeError (node_modules/execa/index.js:174:9)                                                                                                                                                                             
verbose: jest npm-test:      | .                   
verbose: jest npm-test:      | .                   
verbose: jest npm-test:      | .                   
verbose: jest npm-test:      | .                   
verbose: jest npm-test:      | .                   
verbose: jest npm-test:      |   ● gets changed files for hg                                                         
verbose:                     |                                                                                       
verbose:                     | expect(received).toMatch(expected)                                                    
verbose:                     |                                                                                       
verbose:                     | Expected pattern: /PASS __tests__(\/|\\)file2.test.js/                                
verbose:                     | Received string:  "                                                                   
verbose:                     |                                                                                       
verbose:                     |   ● Test suite failed to run                                                          
verbose:                     |                                                                                       
verbose:                     |     abort: empty revision range                                                       
verbose:                     |                                                                                       
verbose:                     | "
verbose:                     |
verbose:                     |       299 | 
verbose:                     |       300 |   ({stdout, stderr} = runJest(DIR, ['-o', '--changedFilesWithAncestor']));
verbose:                     |     > 301 |   expect(stderr).toMatch(/PASS __tests__(\/|\\)file2.test.js/);
verbose:                     |           |                  ^
verbose:                     |       302 |   expect(stderr).toMatch(/PASS __tests__(\/|\\)file3.test.js/);
verbose:                     |       303 | });
verbose:                     |       304 | 
verbose:                     |
verbose:                     |       at Object.toMatch (e2e/__tests__/onlyChanged.test.ts:301:18)
verbose:                     |       at asyncGeneratorStep (e2e/__tests__/onlyChanged.test.ts:13:103)
verbose:                     |       at _next (e2e/__tests__/onlyChanged.test.ts:15:194)
verbose:                     |       at e2e/__tests__/onlyChanged.test.ts:15:364
verbose:                     |       at Object.<anonymous> (e2e/__tests__/onlyChanged.test.ts:15:97)

SimenB · 2019-08-22T17:23:01Z

@targos I noticed some of the mercurial tests should be skipped on CI - does CITGM set the CI env variable?

https://github.com/facebook/jest/blob/522ed17dcebf988450b93ddb8bf748249c75de82/e2e/__tests__/onlyChanged.test.ts#L255-L262

When it comes to build time, if we could make the install step be node ./scripts/remove-postinstall && yarn && yarn build, it'll drop the TS compile which should speed things up. That's what we do for CI already: https://github.com/facebook/jest/blob/522ed17dcebf988450b93ddb8bf748249c75de82/.travis.yml#L14

targos · 2019-08-22T17:45:36Z

@SimenB I don't know if CITGM sets any env variable but you could add something like envVar: { CI: 'true' } to the lookup entry.

SimenB · 2019-08-22T18:05:25Z

Great point! Added that know. I guess we still need to install mercurial, but I think it might pass now

targos · 2019-10-29T07:56:11Z

~~CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker-pipeline/89/console~~

~~With right parameters: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker-pipeline/90/console~~

I'm tired: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker-pipeline/91/console

SimenB · 2019-10-29T08:00:27Z

We'll need master rather than a published version for node 12, and node 13 has a known error with yarn pnp (open PR, not yet merged: yarnpkg/yarn#7650)

targos · 2019-10-29T08:47:45Z

It looks like we need to exclude PPC and Windows

targos · 2019-10-29T08:49:01Z

You can add "master": true to the lookup table to use the master branch instead of the latest release

targos · 2019-10-29T08:49:57Z

And "skip": [">=12"] to skip Node 13 and 14-pre.

SimenB · 2019-10-29T08:53:01Z

We run CI on windows, odd it fails here... Added master: true and just landed a fix for node 13, so hopefully it'll be better. Still need to have hg installed, though

targos · 2019-10-29T08:54:27Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker-pipeline/92/

SimenB · 2019-10-29T09:20:18Z

Ah, windows is missing build tools for https://github.com/node-ffi-napi/weak-napi. Any chance of adding those?

EDIT: node-ffi-napi/weak-napi#21

targos · 2019-10-29T09:30:13Z

What are they?

targos · 2019-10-29T09:31:05Z

The error I see is c:\program files\git\citgm_tmp\090df5f1-f59b-4a39-be96-f858a9a9abb7\jest\node_modules\weak-napi\src\weakref.cc(2): fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'setimmediate.h': No such file or directory [C:\Program Files\Git\citgm_tmp\090df5f1-f59b-4a39-be96-f858a9a9abb7\jest\node_modules\weak-napi\build\weakref.vcxproj]

targos · 2019-10-29T09:31:59Z

@addaleax any idea?

SimenB · 2019-10-29T09:32:04Z

it might be node-ffi-napi/weak-napi#21 rather than any missing tools (I just assumed when I saw the complilation error)... It passes on windows in our CI, see e.g. latest: https://dev.azure.com/jestjs/jest/_build/results?buildId=3634

I don't know what differenes between azure pipelines windows and jenkins windows are

targos · 2019-10-29T10:42:33Z

We have a problem, https://ci.nodejs.org/job/citgm-smoker-nobuild/679/nodes=fedora-latest-x64/console is marked as SUCCESS even though the tests failed.

targos · 2019-10-29T11:13:47Z

Still need to have hg installed, though

I'm not sure that being able to run all Jest tests is a compelling reason to install Mercurial on all our CI hosts.

@nodejs/build What do you think?

targos · 2020-10-20T16:00:52Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker-pipeline/129/

Running citgm-all --includeTags jest this time, to test the skip list.

SimenB · 2020-10-20T16:02:38Z

I see node 15 has been released (congrats!). The PR I linked above which worked in the nightly has not been released, so if Node 15 has been added to CITGM it'll fail. I can make a release tomorrow if needed, or we can just look at master

targos · 2020-10-20T16:04:31Z

10.x in skip works: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/citgm-smoker-nobuild/984/

SimenB · 2020-10-20T16:16:57Z

lib/lookup.json

+    "prefix": "v",
+    "maintainers": ["cpojer", "scotthovestadt", "SimenB", "thymikee", "jeysal"],
+    "yarn": true,
+    "scripts": ["build:js", "test-ci-partial"],


this ran tests locally, but seems like CI skipped it? very odd...

I'll have to try tomorrow

no idea about this - the tests were ran on mac, but timed out.

SimenB · 2020-10-21T10:12:31Z

macOS is incredibly slow, so let's skip it

SimenB · 2020-10-21T10:14:52Z

@targos when convenient, yet another try would be appreciated 🙂

SimenB · 2020-10-21T10:17:58Z

Another thing, seems we have a test that failed on windows, but citgm says it passed?

https://ci.nodejs.org/job/citgm-smoker-nobuild/nodes=win10-vs2019/986/console

SimenB · 2020-10-24T15:39:25Z

I actually noticed a Windows failure on our own CI that GH Actions said was successful. Might have to take a look into that... In the meantime, perhaps skipping windows as well and just test on linux? Better than nothing

targos · 2021-03-05T10:00:22Z

Testing with a new GitHub workflow I created: https://github.com/targos/citgm/actions/runs/624042087

targos · 2021-03-05T10:25:00Z

It fails on macOS with ENAMETOOLONG. Is that a known issue?
https://github.com/targos/citgm/runs/2038722798?check_suite_focus=true

SimenB · 2021-03-05T13:10:46Z

not beyond me mentioning it here 😅 #728 (comment)

We could probably start by landing only for linux at first so it's in?

SimenB · 2021-03-05T14:22:50Z

Very nice with a GH action, tho! Easier to find the logs at least for me than jenkins 😀

SimenB · 2021-03-06T13:32:34Z

Both Windows and macOS are somewhat flaky on our own CI as well, so it might be a good idea regardless to just go for the Linux version for now

targos · 2021-03-06T13:35:10Z

Okay, could you please rebase the PR and add win32 to the skip list?

targos · 2021-03-06T14:33:44Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker-pipeline/139/console

SimenB · 2021-03-06T19:11:24Z

@targos rebased and windows skipped

targos · 2021-03-07T11:22:56Z

@SimenB thank you! It was a long journey :)

SimenB · 2021-03-07T11:23:30Z

🎉🎉

Almost 2 years 🙈

SimenB mentioned this pull request May 10, 2019

Add Jest to lookup #684

Closed

targos added the WIP Work in progress label May 18, 2019

Zirro mentioned this pull request May 29, 2019

lookup: add jsdom #740

Open

richardlau approved these changes Oct 20, 2020

View reviewed changes

SimenB commented Oct 20, 2020

View reviewed changes

Trott mentioned this pull request Feb 19, 2021

Node.js 15.9 regression with Jest ESM nodejs/node#37426

Closed

SimenB added 7 commits March 6, 2021 20:09

chore: add jest to lookup

f7ac2fc

bump timeout even more

128fee2

fix install/build script

b79c5c6

skip node 10

a639e47

skip on darwin and lower timeout again

bf6849e

whoops, not that much

568641e

skip windows

bfaba7a

targos merged commit 9d3cd93 into nodejs:main Mar 7, 2021

SimenB deleted the jest branch March 7, 2021 11:23

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2021

lookup: add jest (#728)

27e1bf8

chore: add jest to lookup #728

chore: add jest to lookup #728

Conversation

SimenB commented May 10, 2019

Checklist

targos commented May 10, 2019

codecov-io commented May 10, 2019 • edited

Codecov Report

targos commented May 10, 2019

SimenB commented May 10, 2019

BridgeAR commented May 11, 2019

SimenB commented May 11, 2019 • edited

targos commented May 11, 2019

BridgeAR commented May 11, 2019

targos commented May 11, 2019

targos commented May 11, 2019

SimenB commented Aug 22, 2019

targos commented Aug 22, 2019

SimenB commented Aug 22, 2019

targos commented Oct 29, 2019 • edited

SimenB commented Oct 29, 2019 • edited

targos commented Oct 29, 2019

targos commented Oct 29, 2019

targos commented Oct 29, 2019

SimenB commented Oct 29, 2019

targos commented Oct 29, 2019

SimenB commented Oct 29, 2019 • edited

targos commented Oct 29, 2019

targos commented Oct 29, 2019

targos commented Oct 29, 2019

SimenB commented Oct 29, 2019 • edited

targos commented Oct 29, 2019

targos commented Oct 29, 2019

targos commented Oct 20, 2020

SimenB commented Oct 20, 2020 • edited

targos commented Oct 20, 2020

SimenB Oct 20, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

SimenB Oct 21, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

SimenB commented Oct 21, 2020

SimenB commented Oct 21, 2020

SimenB commented Oct 21, 2020

SimenB commented Oct 24, 2020 • edited

targos commented Mar 5, 2021

targos commented Mar 5, 2021

SimenB commented Mar 5, 2021

SimenB commented Mar 5, 2021

SimenB commented Mar 6, 2021

targos commented Mar 6, 2021

targos commented Mar 6, 2021

SimenB commented Mar 6, 2021

targos commented Mar 7, 2021 • edited

SimenB commented Mar 7, 2021

codecov-io commented May 10, 2019 •

edited

SimenB commented May 11, 2019 •

edited

targos commented Oct 29, 2019 •

edited

SimenB commented Oct 29, 2019 •

edited

SimenB commented Oct 29, 2019 •

edited

SimenB commented Oct 29, 2019 •

edited

SimenB commented Oct 20, 2020 •

edited

SimenB commented Oct 24, 2020 •

edited

targos commented Mar 7, 2021 •

edited