Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
doc: improve async_hooks asynchronous context example
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
* use writeFile(1) everywhere to log
* prettify execution id graph
* add clearer explanation for TickObject presence
* add causation graph via triggerAsyncId

PR-URL: #33730
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
Reviewed-By: Andrey Pechkurov <apechkurov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <vlad2t@hotmail.com>
  • Loading branch information
lundibundi authored and jasnell committed Jul 3, 2020
1 parent ee3243f commit b4fe76d
Showing 1 changed file with 28 additions and 9 deletions.
37 changes: 28 additions & 9 deletions doc/api/async_hooks.md
Expand Up @@ -331,20 +331,17 @@ async_hooks.createHook({
},
before(asyncId) {
const indentStr = ' '.repeat(indent);
fs.writeFileSync('log.out',
`${indentStr}before: ${asyncId}\n`, { flag: 'a' });
fs.writeSync(process.stdout.fd, `${indentStr}before: ${asyncId}\n`);
indent += 2;
},
after(asyncId) {
indent -= 2;
const indentStr = ' '.repeat(indent);
fs.writeFileSync('log.out',
`${indentStr}after: ${asyncId}\n`, { flag: 'a' });
fs.writeSync(process.stdout.fd, `${indentStr}after: ${asyncId}\n`);
},
destroy(asyncId) {
const indentStr = ' '.repeat(indent);
fs.writeFileSync('log.out',
`${indentStr}destroy: ${asyncId}\n`, { flag: 'a' });
fs.writeSync(process.stdout.fd, `${indentStr}destroy: ${asyncId}\n`);
},
}).enable();

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -380,16 +377,38 @@ the value of the current execution context; which is delineated by calls to
Only using `execution` to graph resource allocation results in the following:

```console
Timeout(7) -> TickObject(6) -> root(1)
root(1)
^
|
TickObject(6)
^
|
Timeout(7)
```

The `TCPSERVERWRAP` is not part of this graph, even though it was the reason for
`console.log()` being called. This is because binding to a port without a host
name is a *synchronous* operation, but to maintain a completely asynchronous
API the user's callback is placed in a `process.nextTick()`.
API the user's callback is placed in a `process.nextTick()`. Which is why
`TickObject` is present in the output and is a 'parent' for `.listen()`
callback.

The graph only shows *when* a resource was created, not *why*, so to track
the *why* use `triggerAsyncId`.
the *why* use `triggerAsyncId`. Which can be represented with the following
graph:

```console
bootstrap(1)
|
˅
TCPSERVERWRAP(5)
|
˅
TickObject(6)
|
˅
Timeout(7)
```

##### `before(asyncId)`

Expand Down

0 comments on commit b4fe76d

Please sign in to comment.