Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wasm: add instantiateStreaming support #22332

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

danbev
Copy link
Contributor

@danbev danbev commented Aug 15, 2018

This commit adds instantiateStreaming support to allow for some
compatability with Web browser environments.

Refs: #21130

Whether or not this feature should be added as been discussed in above referenced issue. My motivation for wanting this is to allow a developer to write code that could be used in both web browser environments and in node.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

This commit adds InstantiateStreaming support to allow for some
compatability with Web browser environments.

Refs: nodejs#21130
@danbev danbev added wip Issues and PRs that are still a work in progress. discuss Issues opened for discussions and feedbacks. labels Aug 15, 2018
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@danbev sadly an error occured when I tried to trigger a build :(

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. label Aug 15, 2018
Copy link
Member

@devsnek devsnek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should support passing a readable stream.

@devsnek
Copy link
Member

devsnek commented Aug 15, 2018

@nodejs/v8 would it be possible to get v8::WasmStreaming before 7.0? i'd like to implement something like devsnek@ab9c03a

Copy link
Member

@TimothyGu TimothyGu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately, I don't think this PR quite changes the status quo with regards to the stated goal:

My motivation for wanting this is to allow a developer to write code that could be used in both web browser environments and in node.

One could already use other mechanisms to compile WASM modules on Node.js, and even if this PR were to be merged one would still have to use different code on Node.js vs. browsers to compile a module.

In fact, since this is incompatible with browser's instantiateStreaming implementation (which does not support Promise<TypedArray> as input), I don't believe this PR should land in Node.js.

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Aug 16, 2018

In fact, since this is incompatible with browser's instantiateStreaming implementation (which does not support Promise as input), I don't believe this PR should land in Node.js.

Ah I see, I was mistakingly thinking that instantiateStreaming taking a promise this would work but realise my mistake here.

Sorry about the noice and thanks @TimothyGu and @devsnek for your feedback!

@danbev danbev closed this Aug 16, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. discuss Issues opened for discussions and feedbacks. wip Issues and PRs that are still a work in progress.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants