Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

src: accept single argument in getProxyDetails #30858

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 4 additions & 3 deletions src/node_util.cc
Expand Up @@ -91,11 +91,12 @@ static void GetProxyDetails(const FunctionCallbackInfo<Value>& args) {
if (!args[0]->IsProxy())
return;

CHECK(args[1]->IsBoolean());

Local<Proxy> proxy = args[0].As<Proxy>();

if (args[1]->IsTrue()) {
// TODO(BridgeAR): Remove the length check as soon as we prohibit access to
// the util binding layer. It's accessed in the wild and some code would break
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd be more explicit than "some code". We know of esm. Are there other packages (that are popular)?

// in case the check is removed.
if (args.Length() == 1 || args[1]->IsTrue()) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The length check here doesn’t change behaviour and could safely be dropped, so you can apply the TODO comment right now if you want.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You mean if I write if (!args[1]->IsFalse()) { ...old behavior... } else { ...new behavior... }?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, something like that … feel free to ignore though :)

Local<Value> ret[] = {
proxy->GetTarget(),
proxy->GetHandler()
Expand Down
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions test/parallel/test-util-inspect-proxy.js
Expand Up @@ -50,6 +50,10 @@ let details = processUtil.getProxyDetails(proxyObj, true);
assert.strictEqual(target, details[0]);
assert.strictEqual(handler, details[1]);

details = processUtil.getProxyDetails(proxyObj);
assert.strictEqual(target, details[0]);
assert.strictEqual(handler, details[1]);

details = processUtil.getProxyDetails(proxyObj, false);
assert.strictEqual(target, details);

Expand Down