Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

n-api: fix false assumption on napi_async_context structures #32928

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

legendecas
Copy link
Member

napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@legendecas legendecas added test Issues and PRs related to the tests. node-api Issues and PRs related to the Node-API. labels Apr 19, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

Landed in 307c67b

@addaleax addaleax closed this Apr 27, 2020
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
@legendecas legendecas deleted the napi_callback_scope branch April 28, 2020 02:10
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
@BridgeAR BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Apr 28, 2020
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Apr 28, 2020
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
node-api Issues and PRs related to the Node-API. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants