Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

child_process: retain reference to data with advanced serialization #38728

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

addaleax
Copy link
Member

Do the same thing we do for other streams, and retain a reference to
the Buffer that was sent over IPC while the write request is active,
so that it doesn’t get garbage collected while the data is still in
flight.

(This is a good example of why it’s a bad idea that we’re not re-using
the general streams implementation for IPC and instead maintain
separate usage of the low-level I/O primitives.)

Fixes: #34797

Do the same thing we do for other streams, and retain a reference to
the Buffer that was sent over IPC while the write request is active,
so that it doesn’t get garbage collected while the data is still in
flight.

(This is a good example of why it’s a bad idea that we’re not re-using
the general streams implementation for IPC and instead maintain
separate usage of the low-level I/O primitives.)

Fixes: nodejs#34797
@github-actions github-actions bot added child_process Issues and PRs related to the child_process subsystem. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels May 18, 2021
@addaleax addaleax removed the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label May 18, 2021
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

Landed in dc43066

@addaleax addaleax closed this May 23, 2021
addaleax added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2021
Do the same thing we do for other streams, and retain a reference to
the Buffer that was sent over IPC while the write request is active,
so that it doesn’t get garbage collected while the data is still in
flight.

(This is a good example of why it’s a bad idea that we’re not re-using
the general streams implementation for IPC and instead maintain
separate usage of the low-level I/O primitives.)

Fixes: #34797

PR-URL: #38728
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
@addaleax addaleax deleted the 34797-dev branch May 23, 2021 14:26
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2021
Do the same thing we do for other streams, and retain a reference to
the Buffer that was sent over IPC while the write request is active,
so that it doesn’t get garbage collected while the data is still in
flight.

(This is a good example of why it’s a bad idea that we’re not re-using
the general streams implementation for IPC and instead maintain
separate usage of the low-level I/O primitives.)

Fixes: #34797

PR-URL: #38728
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
@danielleadams danielleadams mentioned this pull request May 31, 2021
richardlau pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2021
Do the same thing we do for other streams, and retain a reference to
the Buffer that was sent over IPC while the write request is active,
so that it doesn’t get garbage collected while the data is still in
flight.

(This is a good example of why it’s a bad idea that we’re not re-using
the general streams implementation for IPC and instead maintain
separate usage of the low-level I/O primitives.)

Fixes: #34797

PR-URL: #38728
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
richardlau pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2021
Do the same thing we do for other streams, and retain a reference to
the Buffer that was sent over IPC while the write request is active,
so that it doesn’t get garbage collected while the data is still in
flight.

(This is a good example of why it’s a bad idea that we’re not re-using
the general streams implementation for IPC and instead maintain
separate usage of the low-level I/O primitives.)

Fixes: #34797

PR-URL: #38728
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
richardlau pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2021
Do the same thing we do for other streams, and retain a reference to
the Buffer that was sent over IPC while the write request is active,
so that it doesn’t get garbage collected while the data is still in
flight.

(This is a good example of why it’s a bad idea that we’re not re-using
the general streams implementation for IPC and instead maintain
separate usage of the low-level I/O primitives.)

Fixes: #34797

PR-URL: #38728
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
@richardlau richardlau mentioned this pull request Jul 20, 2021
foxxyz pushed a commit to foxxyz/node that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2021
Do the same thing we do for other streams, and retain a reference to
the Buffer that was sent over IPC while the write request is active,
so that it doesn’t get garbage collected while the data is still in
flight.

(This is a good example of why it’s a bad idea that we’re not re-using
the general streams implementation for IPC and instead maintain
separate usage of the low-level I/O primitives.)

Fixes: nodejs#34797

PR-URL: nodejs#38728
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
richardlau pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2021
Do the same thing we do for other streams, and retain a reference to
the Buffer that was sent over IPC while the write request is active,
so that it doesn’t get garbage collected while the data is still in
flight.

(This is a good example of why it’s a bad idea that we’re not re-using
the general streams implementation for IPC and instead maintain
separate usage of the low-level I/O primitives.)

Fixes: #34797

PR-URL: #38728
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
@richardlau richardlau mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2021
dbjorge added a commit to microsoft/accessibility-insights-web that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2022
#### Details

This PR bumps the version of Node we use in CI builds on both GitHub Actions and Azure DevOps to the latest v14 (`14.19.0`).

This is primarily in the hopes of resolving an issue we've seen in a few recent PR builds for dependabot PRs where builds fail in webpack with an error that looks like this:

```
Running "concurrent:webpack-all" (concurrent) task

    Running "exec:webpack-prod" (exec) task
    >> internal/child_process/serialization.js:70
    >>       yield deserializer.readValue();
    >>                          ^
    >> 
    >> Error: Unable to deserialize cloned data.
    >>     at parseChannelMessages (internal/child_process/serialization.js:70:26)
    >>     at parseChannelMessages.next (<anonymous>)
    >>     at Pipe.channel.onread (internal/child_process.js:599:18)
    >> Exited with code: 1.
    >> Error executing child process: Error: Process exited with code 1.
```

This symptom is similar to the one resolved by nodejs/node#38728, which is included in 14.17.4

##### Motivation

* Keep deps up to date
* Attempt to avoid an error blocking PR builds (#5134, #5135, #5136)

##### Context

n/a

#### Pull request checklist
<!-- If a checklist item is not applicable to this change, write "n/a" in the checkbox -->
- [n/a] Addresses an existing issue: #0000
- [x] Ran `yarn fastpass`
- [n/a] Added/updated relevant unit test(s) (and ran `yarn test`)
- [n/a] Verified code coverage for the changes made. Check coverage report at: `<rootDir>/test-results/unit/coverage`
- [x] PR title *AND* final merge commit title both start with a semantic tag (`fix:`, `chore:`, `feat(feature-name):`, `refactor:`). See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
- [n/a] (UI changes only) Added screenshots/GIFs to description above
- [n/a] (UI changes only) Verified usability with NVDA/JAWS
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
child_process Issues and PRs related to the child_process subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Crash deserializing IPC message using advanced serialization
7 participants