Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

async_hooks: add async local storage propagation benchmarks #46414

Merged

Conversation

legendecas
Copy link
Member

Add micro-benchmarks to verify the performance degradation related to
the number of active AsyncLocalStorages.

With these benchmarks, trying to improve the async context propagation
to be an O(1) operation, which is an operation more frequent compared
to asyncLocalStorage.run and asyncLocalStorage.getStore.

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added async_hooks Issues and PRs related to the async hooks subsystem. benchmark Issues and PRs related to the benchmark subsystem. labels Jan 30, 2023
@jasnell jasnell added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 30, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 30, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

Add micro-benchmarks to verify the performance degradation related to
the number of active `AsyncLocalStorage`s.

With these benchmarks, trying to improve the async context propagation
to be an O(1) operation, which is an operation more frequent compared
to `asyncLocalStorage.run` and `asyncLocalStorage.getStore`.
@legendecas
Copy link
Member Author

Style fix after #46424 landed.

@legendecas legendecas added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Feb 2, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Feb 2, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@Flarna Flarna added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Feb 3, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Feb 3, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 3000d77 into nodejs:main Feb 3, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 3000d77

@legendecas legendecas deleted the async_hooks/als_benchmark branch February 4, 2023 02:00
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2023
Add micro-benchmarks to verify the performance degradation related to
the number of active `AsyncLocalStorage`s.

With these benchmarks, trying to improve the async context propagation
to be an O(1) operation, which is an operation more frequent compared
to `asyncLocalStorage.run` and `asyncLocalStorage.getStore`.

PR-URL: #46414
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Feb 19, 2023
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
Add micro-benchmarks to verify the performance degradation related to
the number of active `AsyncLocalStorage`s.

With these benchmarks, trying to improve the async context propagation
to be an O(1) operation, which is an operation more frequent compared
to `asyncLocalStorage.run` and `asyncLocalStorage.getStore`.

PR-URL: #46414
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
async_hooks Issues and PRs related to the async hooks subsystem. benchmark Issues and PRs related to the benchmark subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants