Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tools: automate brotli update #47205

Merged

Conversation

marco-ippolito
Copy link
Member

@marco-ippolito marco-ippolito commented Mar 21, 2023

Refs: nodejs/security-wg#828
This is the first attempt to automate brotli update.
These two files get deleted by the update, maybe we should save them?
https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/deps/brotli/c/common/dictionary.bin.br
https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/deps/brotli/c/common/dictionary.bin
@nodejs/security-wg

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/actions

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. tools Issues and PRs related to the tools directory. labels Mar 21, 2023
Copy link
Member

@anonrig anonrig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The commit & pull request title is wrong. brotly should be brotli.

@marco-ippolito marco-ippolito changed the title tools: automate brotly update tools: automate brotli update Mar 21, 2023
Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

These two files get deleted by the update, maybe we should save them?

Do you mean that when updated Node.js will no longer have those files? They still existing in the main branch of brotli so them being removed does not make sense to me.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

This is where I see them still existing in the upstream - https://github.com/google/brotli/tree/master/c/common

@marco-ippolito
Copy link
Member Author

marco-ippolito commented Mar 22, 2023

@mhdawson they are not present in the c/common folder of the release zip/tar.gz, which is odd

@marco-ippolito marco-ippolito added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Mar 31, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Mar 31, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit da8c099 into nodejs:main Mar 31, 2023
23 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in da8c099

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2023
PR-URL: #47205
Refs: nodejs/security-wg#828
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Adrian Estrada <edsadr@gmail.com>
@RafaelGSS RafaelGSS mentioned this pull request Apr 6, 2023
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2023
PR-URL: #47205
Refs: nodejs/security-wg#828
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Adrian Estrada <edsadr@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2023
PR-URL: #47205
Refs: nodejs/security-wg#828
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Adrian Estrada <edsadr@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2023
PR-URL: #47205
Refs: nodejs/security-wg#828
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Adrian Estrada <edsadr@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
PR-URL: #47205
Refs: nodejs/security-wg#828
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Adrian Estrada <edsadr@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. tools Issues and PRs related to the tools directory.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants