Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: add importing util to example of `process.report.getReport' #47298

Merged

Conversation

deokjinkim
Copy link
Contributor

@deokjinkim deokjinkim commented Mar 29, 2023

util.inspect() is used, but util is not imported.
So added importing util to example of process.report.getReport.
Plus, fix wrong importing in example of process.memoryUsage.rss().

@VoltrexKeyva VoltrexKeyva added doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. process Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem. labels Mar 29, 2023
util.inspect() is used, but `util` is not imported. So added
importing util to example of `process.report.getReport`.
Plus, fix wrong importing in example of `process.memoryUsage.rss()`.
@deokjinkim deokjinkim added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. labels Mar 30, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Mar 31, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit accfe8e into nodejs:main Mar 31, 2023
20 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in accfe8e

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2023
util.inspect() is used, but `util` is not imported. So added
importing util to example of `process.report.getReport`.
Plus, fix wrong importing in example of `process.memoryUsage.rss()`.

PR-URL: #47298
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Harshitha K P <harshitha014@gmail.com>
@RafaelGSS RafaelGSS mentioned this pull request Apr 6, 2023
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2023
util.inspect() is used, but `util` is not imported. So added
importing util to example of `process.report.getReport`.
Plus, fix wrong importing in example of `process.memoryUsage.rss()`.

PR-URL: #47298
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Harshitha K P <harshitha014@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2023
util.inspect() is used, but `util` is not imported. So added
importing util to example of `process.report.getReport`.
Plus, fix wrong importing in example of `process.memoryUsage.rss()`.

PR-URL: #47298
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Harshitha K P <harshitha014@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2023
util.inspect() is used, but `util` is not imported. So added
importing util to example of `process.report.getReport`.
Plus, fix wrong importing in example of `process.memoryUsage.rss()`.

PR-URL: #47298
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Harshitha K P <harshitha014@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
util.inspect() is used, but `util` is not imported. So added
importing util to example of `process.report.getReport`.
Plus, fix wrong importing in example of `process.memoryUsage.rss()`.

PR-URL: #47298
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Harshitha K P <harshitha014@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. process Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants