Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deps: add loong64 config into openssl gypi #48043

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

shipujin
Copy link
Member

add loong64 config into openssl

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/gyp

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. openssl Issues and PRs related to the OpenSSL dependency. labels May 17, 2023
@shipujin
Copy link
Member Author

shipujin commented Jun 9, 2023

Update

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

@shipujin I assume that the only non-generated changes that are the ones in the gypi files?

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

I guess that last question did not make sense if all of the .h files are also manually updated which I think is now the case.

It this just what is missing to get loong64 working. I already see that there are filex in - https://github.com/nodejs/node/tree/main/deps/openssl/config/archs/linux64-loongarch64/no-asm

@shipujin
Copy link
Member Author

@shipujin I assume that the only non-generated changes that are the ones in the gypi files?

Yes, once the *gypi file is modified , nodejs can be built using openssl-no-asm in the loong64 environment.

thx~

@shipujin
Copy link
Member Author

I guess that last question did not make sense if all of the .h files are also manually updated which I think is now the case.

It this just what is missing to get loong64 working. I already see that there are filex in - https://github.com/nodejs/node/tree/main/deps/openssl/config/archs/linux64-loongarch64/no-asm

Yes

thx~

@mhdawson mhdawson added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jun 28, 2023
Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jun 28, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

mhdawson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2023
PR-URL: #48043
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

Landed in 9664e66

@mhdawson mhdawson closed this Jun 29, 2023
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2023
PR-URL: #48043
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
@RafaelGSS RafaelGSS mentioned this pull request Jul 3, 2023
Ceres6 pushed a commit to Ceres6/node that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#48043
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
Ceres6 pushed a commit to Ceres6/node that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#48043
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
ruyadorno pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2023
Backport-PR-URL: #49192
PR-URL: #48043
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson midawson@redhat.com
@ruyadorno ruyadorno mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2023
@ruyadorno ruyadorno added the backported-to-v18.x PRs backported to the v18.x-staging branch. label Sep 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backported-to-v18.x PRs backported to the v18.x-staging branch. dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. openssl Issues and PRs related to the OpenSSL dependency.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants