Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(docs): revert auto-generated portion of docs #3654

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 17, 2021

Conversation

wraithgar
Copy link
Member

The content in this portion of the docs is auto-generated.

References

Reverts #3630

@wraithgar wraithgar requested a review from a team as a code owner August 16, 2021 14:40
isaacs added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2021
This should prevent the kind of thing we've seen where people edit the
generated docs, as in #3654 and #3630, and provide them with a helpful
pointer so they put the config documentation changes in the right place.
isaacs added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2021
This should prevent the kind of thing we've seen where people edit the
generated docs, as in #3654 and #3630, and provide them with a helpful
pointer so they put the config documentation changes in the right place.
isaacs added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2021
When we accidentally edit the auto-generated portions of the docs, this
will catch the error and cause CI to fail.

Later phase automated safety check that the early-stage human commenting
in the last commit also addresses.

Re: #3654
Re: #3630
@darcyclarke darcyclarke added semver:patch semver patch level for changes Release 7.x work is associated with a specific npm 7 release labels Aug 17, 2021
@isaacs
Copy link
Contributor

isaacs commented Aug 17, 2021

RSLGTM. Would be nice to also re-add it to the spot where it belongs, maybe pull in the commit from #3630 and edit it to be in the right place?

@ljharb
Copy link
Collaborator

ljharb commented Aug 17, 2021

Does generated content need to be in the repo at all? Or could it be generated on prepack

@wraithgar
Copy link
Member Author

Does generated content need to be in the repo at all? Or could it be generated on prepack

Ideally yes the generated content will be separate from its source components. We made an iterative step to swap out the generated content inside already existing files, and eventually will want to take the next step.

@wraithgar
Copy link
Member Author

RSLGTM. Would be nice to also re-add it to the spot where it belongs, maybe pull in the commit from #3630 and edit it to be in the right place?

Yeah I added a comment to the original PR but for now this gets us back to being able to cut the nodejs/node pr

The content in this portion of the docs is auto-generated.

PR-URL: #3654
Credit: @wraithgar
Close: #3654
Reviewed-by: @nlf
@wraithgar wraithgar merged commit 4314490 into release-next Aug 17, 2021
@wraithgar wraithgar deleted the gar/publish-docs-fix branch August 17, 2021 16:00
wraithgar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2021
This should prevent the kind of thing we've seen where people edit the
generated docs, as in #3654 and #3630, and provide them with a helpful
pointer so they put the config documentation changes in the right place.
wraithgar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2021
When we accidentally edit the auto-generated portions of the docs, this
will catch the error and cause CI to fail.

Later phase automated safety check that the early-stage human commenting
in the last commit also addresses.

Re: #3654
Re: #3630

PR-URL: #3655
Credit: @isaacs
Close: #3655
Reviewed-by: @nlf
isaacs added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2021
This should prevent the kind of thing we've seen where people edit the
generated docs, as in #3654 and #3630, and provide them with a helpful
pointer so they put the config documentation changes in the right place.
isaacs added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2021
When we accidentally edit the auto-generated portions of the docs, this
will catch the error and cause CI to fail.

Later phase automated safety check that the early-stage human commenting
in the last commit also addresses.

Re: #3654
Re: #3630
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Release 7.x work is associated with a specific npm 7 release semver:patch semver patch level for changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants