fix(release): use --first-parent to support merged repos

[fahslaj]

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #21649

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
nx-dev	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Feb 12, 2024 4:28pm

[nx-cloud]

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 7ebe1c1. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution

---

✅ Successfully ran 6 targets

• nx affected --target=e2e --base=c8866acb4acc4152812c32e64d354dd0d4651280 --head=7ebe1c1429600b51d4dd513ac4df0dc071c01670 --parallel=1
• nx affected --targets=lint,test,build --base=c8866acb4acc4152812c32e64d354dd0d4651280 --head=7ebe1c1429600b51d4dd513ac4df0dc071c01670 --parallel=3
• nx run-many -t check-imports check-commit check-lock-files check-codeowners documentation --parallel=1 --no-dte
• nx-cloud record -- nx format:check --base=c8866acb4acc4152812c32e64d354dd0d4651280 --head=7ebe1c1429600b51d4dd513ac4df0dc071c01670
• nx documentation --no-dte
• nx affected -t e2e-macos --parallel=1 --base=c8866acb4acc4152812c32e64d354dd0d4651280 --head=7ebe1c1429600b51d4dd513ac4df0dc071c01670

---

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

[JamesHenry]

Actually on second look, is that correct?

You have HEAD as a positional twice it looks like?

[fahslaj]

Actually on second look, is that correct?

You have HEAD as a positional twice it looks like?

The second HEAD is the value being passed for --first-parent. I can use "=" to make it more explicit though.

EDIT: It seems to error when using --first-parent=HEAD. Looks like it is redundant. I've removed it.

[github-actions]

This pull request has already been merged/closed. If you experience issues related to these changes, please open a new issue referencing this pull request.