Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MAINT: Use towncrier build explicitly #18794

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 16, 2021

Conversation

charris
Copy link
Member

@charris charris commented Apr 16, 2021

Backport of #18790 and #18792.

Without any argument towncrier defaults to build. But towncrier
added a --version argument to just print the towncrier version.

NumPy relies on passing --version which collides. Even if
towncrier might revert the change, using towncrier build explicitly
just doesn't hurt.

Also use recent release of towncrier on PyPI instead of building
from the master branch.

Closes gh-18788

seberg and others added 2 commits April 16, 2021 14:44
Without any argument towncrier defaults to `build`.  But towncrier
added a `--version` argument to just print the towncrier version.

NumPy relies on passing `--version` which collides.  Even if
towncrier might revert the change, using `towncrier build` explicitly
just doesn't hurt.

Closes numpygh-18788
We were installing towncrier from the github master branch because there
had been no releases with the needed fixes. That has changed with the
recent release of versions 19.9.0 and 21.3.0.
@charris charris added this to the 1.20.3 release milestone Apr 16, 2021
@charris charris changed the title CI, MAINT: Use towncrier build explicitly MAINT: Use towncrier build explicitly Apr 16, 2021
@charris charris added the 08 - Backport Used to tag backport PRs label Apr 16, 2021
@charris charris merged commit bde20c8 into numpy:maintenance/1.20.x Apr 16, 2021
@charris charris deleted the backport-18790 branch April 17, 2021 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants