Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(nuxt): resolve builder using esm syntax #19608

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 11, 2023
Merged

Conversation

danielroe
Copy link
Member

πŸ”— Linked issue

❓ Type of change

  • πŸ“– Documentation (updates to the documentation or readme)
  • 🐞 Bug fix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • πŸ‘Œ Enhancement (improving an existing functionality like performance)
  • ✨ New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • 🧹 Chore (updates to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries)
  • ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

πŸ“š Description

Similar to #19601, we also need to resolve @nuxt/vite-builder via rootDir/nuxt.

πŸ“ Checklist

  • I have linked an issue or discussion.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@codesandbox
Copy link

codesandbox bot commented Mar 11, 2023

CodeSandbox logoCodeSandbox logoΒ  Open in CodeSandbox Web Editor | VS Code | VS Code Insiders

@danielroe danielroe merged commit e13e227 into main Mar 11, 2023
@danielroe danielroe deleted the fix/import-builder branch March 11, 2023 23:11

async function loadBuilder (nuxt: Nuxt, builder: string) {
for (const root of [nuxt.options.rootDir, import.meta.url]) {
const builderPath = await tryResolveModule(builder, root)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can pass search path directly to the kit util (at least mlly reslver supports it)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants