-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perf(vite): rework endsWith to direct index #24746
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7112720
perf(vite): rework endsWith to direct index checking
GalacticHypernova 347ebc6
perf(vite): use trimEnd
GalacticHypernova bae8777
Merge branch 'main' into patch-18
GalacticHypernova bbe112b
Merge branch 'main' into patch-18
GalacticHypernova 02dda29
Merge branch 'main' into patch-18
GalacticHypernova 8ee9adc
chore: revert trimEnd
GalacticHypernova 074973f
Merge branch 'main' into patch-18
GalacticHypernova b068748
Merge branch 'nuxt:main' into patch-18
GalacticHypernova 33dc5a0
Merge branch 'main' into patch-18
GalacticHypernova File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@danielroe this entire slice/trim operation, is it even needed? Can we not just do this?
I saw that pi left a comment there, is there a possibility
codeIndex + (node as any).end - 1
would point to a whitespace?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, I think it's possible it will end with whitespace...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I'll try to run some tests with this. There's gotta be a way to make it work without it..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you could iterate backwards in a while loop... π€
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That could be possible, it will at the very least reduce the amount of characters "digested" by trim I suppose which runs both ways (will make some benchmarks for this), but I wonder if there's a way to make it even faster, like if the expression itself will not contain whitespace, in which case last index could be used directly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For starter optimization, we can use trimEnd which increase performance by ~50%