Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Update Changes
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history 
Updated separately to allow the previous patch to be used for multiple
releases.
  • Loading branch information
@xavierleroy @dra27
xavierleroy authored and dra27 committed Jan 20, 2022
1 parent 4b4c643 commit 48ad9be
Showing 1 changed file with 9 additions and 0 deletions.
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions Changes
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,6 +8,15 @@ OCaml 4.10 maintenance branch
(report by Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias, analysis and fix by Stephen Dolan,
code by Xavier Leroy, review by Hugo Heuzard and Gabriel Scherer)

- #10250, #10266: Dynamically allocate alternate signal stacks to
accommodate changes in Glibc 2.34.
(Xavier Leroy, reports by Tomasz Kłoczko and R.W.M. Jones, review by Anil
Madhavapeddy, Stephen Dolan, and Florian Angeletti)

- #10698, #10726, #10891: Free the alternate signal stack when the main OCaml
code or an OCaml thread stops.
(Xavier Leroy, review by David Allsopp, Florian Angeletti and Damien Doligez)

OCaml 4.10.2 (8 December 2020)
------------------------------

Expand Down

5 comments on commit 48ad9be

@Zimmi48
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @dra27, thanks for backporting the fix! When is the 4.10.3 release planned?

@gasche
Copy link
Member

@gasche gasche commented on 48ad9be Jan 24, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are not planning to do a 4.10.3 release, but opam install 4.10.x should have the patches applied.

@gasche
Copy link
Member

@gasche gasche commented on 48ad9be Jan 24, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(See the discussion in the PRs for more context.)

@Zimmi48
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I didn't even know this was a thing.

(See the discussion in the PRs for more context.)

Which one? The ones I subscribed to didn't have any recent discussion.

@gasche
Copy link
Member

@gasche gasche commented on 48ad9be Jan 24, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was thinking of #10250 (comment) . Technically it is given in the Changes entry above, but indeed one out of 5 numbers, it's quicker to give it directly :-)

Please sign in to comment.