Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] BottomBarSheet: Rename a sheet with style content on Firefox #3894

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rrahir
Copy link
Collaborator

@rrahir rrahir commented Mar 25, 2024

The issue addressed in PR #3351 unfortunately used a contentEditable value that is not compatible with Firefox 1

This revision implements the first strategy explored by the aforementioned PR by removing the full format from the contenteditable span when we stop the edition.

Testing required to define some properties as JSdom does not properly support the implementation of innerText (see 2)

Task: 3754944

Description:

description of this task, what is implemented and why it is implemented that way.

Task: : TASK_ID

review checklist

  • feature is organized in plugin, or UI components
  • support of duplicate sheet (deep copy)
  • in model/core: ranges are Range object, and can be adapted (adaptRanges)
  • in model/UI: ranges are strings (to show the user)
  • undo-able commands (uses this.history.update)
  • multiuser-able commands (has inverse commands and transformations where needed)
  • new/updated/removed commands are documented
  • exportable in excel
  • translations (_t("qmsdf %s", abc))
  • unit tested
  • clean commented code
  • track breaking changes
  • doc is rebuild (npm run doc)
  • status is correct in Odoo

The issue addressed in PR #3351 unfortunately used a
`contentEditable` value that is not compatible with Firefox [1]

This revision implements the first strategy explored by the
aforementioned PR by removing the full format from  the contenteditable
span when we stop the edition.

Testing required to define some properties as JSdom does not properly
support the implementation of innerText (see [2])

[1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Global_attributes/contenteditable#browser_compatibility
[2]: jsdom/jsdom#1245

Task: 3754944
@robodoo
Copy link
Collaborator

robodoo commented Mar 25, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@hokolomopo hokolomopo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice branch name

Sure-buddy

@@ -12,6 +12,15 @@ export let OWL_TEMPLATES: Document;
beforeAll(() => {
OWL_TEMPLATES = getParsedOwlTemplateBundle();
setDefaultSheetViewSize(1000);
Object.defineProperty(Element.prototype, "innerText", {
get: function myProperty() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
get: function myProperty() {
get: function () {

This whole syntax looks strange, but the function name doesn't seem mandatory

Copy link
Collaborator

@LucasLefevre LucasLefevre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

robodoo r+

robodoo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
The issue addressed in PR #3351 unfortunately used a
`contentEditable` value that is not compatible with Firefox [1]

This revision implements the first strategy explored by the
aforementioned PR by removing the full format from  the contenteditable
span when we stop the edition.

Testing required to define some properties as JSdom does not properly
support the implementation of innerText (see [2])

[1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Global_attributes/contenteditable#browser_compatibility
[2]: jsdom/jsdom#1245

closes #3894

Task: 3754944
Signed-off-by: Lucas Lefèvre (lul) <lul@odoo.com>
@robodoo robodoo closed this Mar 25, 2024
@fw-bot fw-bot deleted the saas-16.3-make-FF-great-again-rar branch April 8, 2024 13:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants