Upgrade to pnpm 8

[paescuj]

No description provided.

[paescuj]

Postponed to EOL of Node.js 14 (2023-04-30)

[danny007in]

better to use only latest npm
is there any special use of pnpm

[paescuj]

better to use only latest npm is there any special use of pnpm

What do you mean exactly?

[danny007in]

mean exactly?

Better to replace pnpm to latest npm

[gustavohenke]

Hey @danny007in, why do you think so?

[danny007in]

Hey @danny007in, why do you think so?

Exactly that is my point, using stable npm package best option, it also links files from the global store.

[paescuj]

[...] it also links files from the global store.

Did I miss something here? I'm not aware of this. Could you share a link?

Besides that, I don't think we're going back to npm (at least for now).
It has been shown that pnpm works very well here. In particular, it has helped to greatly reduce the duration of the tests.

[danny007in]

[...] it also links files from the global store.

Did I miss something here? I'm not aware of this. Could you share a link?

Besides that, I don't think we're going back to npm (at least for now). It has been shown that pnpm works very well here. In particular, it has helped to greatly reduce the duration of the tests.

npm v9 works as pnpm now.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/74569635/npm-9-doesnt-copy-js-files-for-local-dependencies

[coveralls]

coverage: 99.197%. remained the same when pulling c95a841 on paescuj:pnpm-8 into 77fbc03 on open-cli-tools:main.

[gustavohenke]

@paescuj did you not want to proceed with this?