Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Python autoinstrumentation for musl libc based application containers #2266

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ilyamochalov
Copy link

@ilyamochalov ilyamochalov commented Oct 24, 2023

Description: adding musl build to python autoinstrumentation

Link to tracking Issue: #2264

Testing: updated e2e test and also added unit tests cases

Documentation: updated the README file

@ilyamochalov ilyamochalov requested a review from a team as a code owner October 24, 2023 08:19
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Oct 24, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: ilyamochalov / name: Ilya Mochalov (4b2aead)

@ilyamochalov ilyamochalov marked this pull request as draft October 24, 2023 08:52
@ilyamochalov ilyamochalov force-pushed the ISSUE-2264-python-musl branch 2 times, most recently from 106da37 to f36f69b Compare November 7, 2023 05:51
@ilyamochalov ilyamochalov marked this pull request as ready for review November 7, 2023 05:52
FROM busybox

COPY --from=build /operator-build/workspace /autoinstrumentation
COPY --from=build /operator-build/workspace /autoinstrumentation/linux-x64
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure how in details looks release process for docker images, but if it release new version just after merge to main it can be breaking change for currently released version.

If the new image will be applicable only to the new operator release - then it LGTM.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A very good concern! I will check

@TylerHelmuth
Copy link
Member

@ilyamochalov I will have time to review this PR next week. Thank you for contributing.

@jaronoff97
Copy link
Contributor

@ilyamochalov looks like there are some failing tests here, would you be able to take a look so we can get this in the next release?

@ilyamochalov
Copy link
Author

@jaronoff97 I will take a look at failing tests. When is the next release?

@jaronoff97
Copy link
Contributor

Sometime next week, i believe.

@ilyamochalov
Copy link
Author

@jaronoff97 I am dragged into some other projects. I won't fix tests this week. Please go ahead and release without this change.

@jaronoff97
Copy link
Contributor

no problem, thank you for letting me know. I hope to cut the release today.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants